...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions >Assessing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: integrating psychological dimensions in the Adaptive Capacity Wheel
【24h】

Assessing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: integrating psychological dimensions in the Adaptive Capacity Wheel

机译:评估适应气候变化的机构能力:整合自适应容量轮中的心理维度

获取原文
           

摘要

Several case studies show that social factors like institutions, perceptions and social capital strongly affect social capacities to adapt to climate change. Together with economic and technological development they are important for building social capacities. However, there are almost no methodologies for the systematic assessment of social factors. After reviewing existing methodologies we identify the Adaptive Capacity Wheel (ACW) by Gupta et al. (2010), developed for assessing the adaptive capacity of institutions, as the most comprehensive and operationalised framework to assess social factors. The ACW differentiates 22 criteria to assess 6 dimensions: variety, learning capacity, room for autonomous change, leadership, availability of resources, fair governance. To include important psychological factors we extended the ACW by two dimensions: "adaptation motivation" refers to actors' motivation to realise, support and/or promote adaptation to climate; "adaptation belief" refers to actors' perceptions of realisability and effectiveness of adaptation measures. We applied the extended ACW to assess adaptive capacities of four sectors – water management, flood/coastal protection, civil protection and regional planning – in northwestern Germany. The assessments of adaptation motivation and belief provided a clear added value. The results also revealed some methodological problems in applying the ACW (e.g. overlap of dimensions), for which we propose methodological solutions.
机译:几个案例研究表明,社会因素,如机构,感知和社会资本强烈影响社会能力,以适应气候变化。与经济技术开发一起,他们对建立社会能力很重要。但是,几乎没有关于社会因素的系统评估的方法。在审查现有方法后,我们通过Gupta等识别自适应容量轮(ACW)。 (2010年),为评估机构的适应能力而开发,作为评估社会因素的最全面和运营的框架。 ACW区分22标准以评估6维度:各种,学习能力,自主变革,领导,资源可用性,公平治理。包括重要的心理因素,我们将ACW扩展了两个维度:“适应动机”是指演员的动机实现,支持和/或促进气候适应; “适应信念”是指演员的可信度的看法和适应措施的有效性。我们申请扩展ACW以评估德国西北部四个部门 - 水管理,洪水/沿海保护,民防和区域规划的自适应能力。适应动机和信念的评估提供了明确的附加值。结果还揭示了应用ACW(例如尺寸重叠)的一些方法论问题,我们提出了方法论解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号