首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychopharmacology reports. >Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study
【24h】

Blonanserin vs risperidone in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3, 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized controlled study

机译:Blonanserin与日本精神分裂症患者的risperidone:HOC分析阶段3,8周,多中心,双盲,随机对照研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To report the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia compared with risperidone in a Japanese multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study based on post hoc sensitivity analysis in addition to the previous results reported by Miura and discuss the current approaches for schizophrenia treatment. Methods Of 302 patients randomized, 156 received blonanserin (8‐24?mg/d) and 145 received risperidone (2‐6?mg/d) for 8?weeks. Efficacy variables included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score for the primary outcome, PANSS subscale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impression‐Improvement (CGI‐I) for secondary outcomes. Safety variables included treatment‐emergent adverse events, Drug Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale scores, laboratory data, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc Results Blonanserin was not inferior to risperidone in the change in PANSS total score at a non‐inferior margin of ?7 (intergroup difference, ?0.46; 95% CI, ?4.40 to 3.48). Post hoc analyses wholly supported the primary result. No major difference was found in the changes in BPRS scores and the improvement rate on CGI‐I between the drugs. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two drugs. Blonanserin was associated with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. However, blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of akathisia and excitability compared with risperidone. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity with no specific events of predominant high severity in the both drugs. Conclusions Blonanserin exerted the similar efficacy to risperidone in both positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. Blonanserin will serve as a favorable treatment option for schizophrenia in daily clinical practice.
机译:目的举报基于后HOC敏感性分析的日本多中心,随机,双盲研究中的蓖麻精酮与利培酮相比报告了Blonanserin对精神分症患者的疗效和安全性。除了MIURA报告的先前结果,并讨论精神分裂症治疗的目前的方法。 302例随机患者的方法,156例接受Blonanserin(8-24×mg / d)和145次接受的risperidone(2-6?mg / d),8?周。功效变量包括阳性和负综合征规模(平底锅)主要结果的总分,平底锅子级,短暂的精神评级规模(BPRS)和临床全球印象 - 改进(CGI-I)进行二次结果。安全变量包括治疗 - 急促不良事件,药物诱导的外锥瘤症状规模分数,实验室数据,生命体征,心电图,等结果Blonanserin并不逊于威尔帕酮在平底锅的变化中,在不低劣的裕度(互动差异,?0.46; 95%CI,?4.40至3.48)。后HOC分析完全支持主要结果。在BPRS分数的变化中没有发现主要差异以及药物之间的CGI-I的提高率。两种药物中不良事件的发生率类似。与立苯胺相比,Blonanserin与催乳素增加,体重增加和直向性低血压的风险较低。然而,与蓖麻籽酮相比,Blonanserin与Akathisia和兴奋性更高的发病率有关。大多数不良事件在严重程度中均为温和,在两种药物中没有任何特定的占主导地位的事件。结论Blonanserin对精神分裂症患者的阳性和阴性症状施用类似的疗效,与Risperidone相比,催乳素增加,体重增加和直向性低血压的风险较低。 Blonanserin将作为日常临床实践中精神分裂症的有利治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号