...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis
【24h】

Does Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Conventional Imaging Modalities Decrease the Rates of Surgical Margin Involvement and Reoperation?: A Case–Control Comparative Analysis

机译:乳房磁共振成像与常规成像模式相结合,降低了手术边缘受累和再捕获的速率吗?:案例控制比较分析

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with conventional breast imaging techniques decreases the rates of margin involvement and reexcision. Data on patients who underwent surgery for primary operable breast cancer were obtained from the Changhua Christian Hospital (CCH) breast cancer database. The rate of surgical margin involvement and the rate of reoperation were compared between patients who underwent conventional breast imaging modalities (Group A: mammography and sonography) and those who received breast MRI in addition to conventional imaging (Group B: mammography, sonography, and MRI). A total of 1468 patients were enrolled in this study. Among the 733 patients in Group A, 377 (51.4%) received breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 356 (48.6%) received mastectomy. Among the 735 patients in Group B, 348 (47.3%) received BCS and 387 (52.7%) received mastectomy. There were no significant differences in operative method between patients who received conventional imaging alone and those that received MRI and conventional imaging ( P = 0.13). The rate of detection of pathological multifocal/multicentric breast cancer was markedly higher in patients who received preoperative MRI than in those who underwent conventional imaging alone (14.3% vs 8.6%, P < 0.01). The overall rate of surgical margin involvement was significantly lower in patients who received MRI (5.0%) than in those who received conventional imaging alone (9.0%) ( P < 0.01). However, a significant reduction in rate of surgical margin positivity was only observed in patients who received BCS (Group A, 14.6%; Group B, 6.6%, P < 0.01). The overall BCS reoperation rates were 11.7% in the conventional imaging group and 3.2% in the combined MRI group ( P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of residual cancer in specimens obtained during reoperation between the 2 preoperative imaging groups (Group A, 50%; Group B, 81.8%, P = 0.09). In multivariate analysis, multifocal/multicentric breast cancer (odds ratio = 2.38, P = 0.02) and without MRI use (odds ratio = 2.35, P < 0.01) were the major predisposing factors to margin involvement in patients received BCS. Preoperative breast MRI combined with conventional breast imaging results in a lower rate of surgical margin involvement and reoperations in patients who receive BCS.
机译:本研究的目的是评估术前乳房共振成像(MRI)是否与常规乳房成像技术相结合,降低了边缘参与和重新开发的率。从彰化基督教医院(CCH)乳腺癌数据库获得接受初级可操作乳腺癌手术的患者的数据。在接受常规乳房成像方式(A组:乳房摄影和超声检查)的患者之间比较外科保证金的参与和再生率,以及除了传统成像外,接受乳房MRI的人(B组:乳房摄影,超声检查和MRI )。本研究共有1468名患者。在A组的733名患者中,377名(51.4%)接受哺乳期手术(BCS)和356(48.6%)接受乳房切除术。在B组735名患者中,348名(47.3%)收到BCS和387(52.7%)患有乳房切除术。单独接受常规成像的患者与接受MRI和常规成像的患者之间没有显着差异(P = 0.13)。在接受术前MRI的患者中,病理多焦点/多中心乳腺癌的检测率明显高于术前MRI,而不是单独接受常规成像的人(14.3%Vs 8.6%,P <0.01)。接受MRI(5.0%)的患者比在接受常规成像(9.0%)(P <0.01)的患者中,手术边缘参与的总体速率显着降低。然而,在接受BCS的患者中仅观察到外科阳性阳性阳性阳性的显着降低(14.6%; B组,6.6%,P <0.01)。在常规成像组中,总BCS再次速率为11.7%,组合MRI组中的3.2%(P <0.01)。在2个术前成像组(A,50%组,B组,81.8%,P = 0.09)之间再生期间,在再生过程中获得的标本中残留癌率没有显着差异。在多变量分析中,多焦点/多中心乳腺癌(多元率= 2.38,P = 0.02),没有MRI使用(差价率= 2.35,P <0.01)是患者接受BCS的主要受累的主要易感因素。术前乳房MRI与常规的乳房成像结合导致接受BCS的患者的手术边缘受累和再次进展率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号