首页> 外文期刊>Medical Education Online >Environments, processes, and outcomes - using the LEPO framework to examine medical student learning preferences with traditional and electronic resources
【24h】

Environments, processes, and outcomes - using the LEPO framework to examine medical student learning preferences with traditional and electronic resources

机译:环境,流程和结果 - 使用LEPO框架来检查与传统和电子资源的医学学生学习偏好

获取原文
           

摘要

Changes in medical student learning preferences help drive innovation in teaching and require schools and commercial resources to quickly adapt. However, few studies have detailed the relationship of learner preferences to the environment and teaching modalities used in the pre-clerkship years, nor do they incorporate third-party resources. Our study attempts to analyze learner preferences by comparing the use of traditional and third-party resources. In 2017–18, a survey was distributed to medical students and residents at two accredited medical schools. Participants noted preferred styles of learning regarding lecture duration, timing, location, format, third-party resources, learner types and USMLE Step 1 scores. The ‘Learning Environment, Learning Processes, and Learning Outcomes’ (LEPO) framework [5] was used to examine learner preferences, with responses compared using the Mann-Whitney U and two proportion z-tests. A total of 329 respondents completed the survey: 62.7% medical students and 37.3% residents. The majority of participants identified their learning style by Kolb [6] as converging (33.0%) or accommodating (39.2%). Students preferred lectures 30–40?minutes long (43.3%), during morning hours (54.2%), in their own homes (52.0%), via online lectures with simultaneous drawings (56.0%), and classroom/podcast lectures with PowerPoint? presentations (54.3%). Overall, students rated third-party resource characteristics higher than traditional curricula, including effectiveness of teachers, length, quality, time of day, and venue (p?
机译:医学学生学习偏好的变化有助于推动教学创新,并要求学校和商业资源快速适应。然而,很少有研究详细介绍了学习者偏好对前职员多年来的环境和教学方式的关系,也没有纳入第三方资源。我们的研究试图通过比较传统和第三方资源的使用来分析学习者偏好。 2017 - 18年,一项调查分发给两所经认可医学院的医学生和居民。参与者注意到关于讲义课程,时间,位置,格式,第三方资源,学习者类型和USMLE步骤1分数的首选学习方式。 “学习环境,学习过程和学习结果”(LEPO)框架[5]用于检查学习者偏好,使用Mann-Whitney U和两个比例Z测试进行响应。共有329名受访者完成了调查:62.7%的医学生和37.3%的居民。大多数参与者通过KOLB [6]作为融合(33.0%)或适应(39.2%),将他们的学习风格确定为其学习风格(39.2%)。学生首选讲座30-40分钟(43.3%),在早晨(54.2%),在他们自己的房屋(52.0%),通过在线讲座,同时图纸(56.0%),以及课堂/播客与PowerPoint进行PowerPoint?演示文稿(54.3%)。总体而言,学生评估了第三方资源特征高于传统课程,包括教师的有效性,长度,质量,一天的时间和地点(P?<0.001),而且还优选的小型群体格式。学生报告了动画视频(46.6%)和同时图纸(46.5%)作为保留信息的最有效手段。了解更改学习者偏好对于为当今学生创造最佳课程非常重要。使用LEPO框架,本研究确定了成功教学学生,包括商业和传统资源的关键偏好。这些结果还可以帮助指导由于近期Covid-19大流行而必要的教育学的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号