首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Preliminary Investigation of the Safety of Escalating Cannabinoid Doses in Healthy Dogs
【24h】

Preliminary Investigation of the Safety of Escalating Cannabinoid Doses in Healthy Dogs

机译:初步调查健康犬升级大麻素病毒剂量的安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of three cannabis oil formulations, containing predominantly CBD, THC, or CBD and THC (1.5:1) versus placebo in dogs. Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, parallel study. Animals: Twenty healthy Beagle dogs (10 males, 10 females). Methods: Dogs were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups (n=4 dogs per group balanced by sex): CBD-predominant oil, THC-predominant oil, CBD/THC-predominant oil (1.5:1), sunflower oil placebo, medium-chain triglyceride oil placebo. Up to ten escalating doses of the oils were planned for administration via oral gavage, with at least three days separating doses. Clinical observations, physical examinations, complete blood counts, clinical chemistry, and plasma cannabinoids were used to assess safety, tolerability, and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). AEs were rated as mild, moderate, or severe/medically significant. Results: Dose escalation of the CBD-predominant oil formulation was shown to be as safe as placebo and safer than dose escalation of oils containing THC (CBD/THC oil or THC oil). The placebo oils were delivered up to ten escalating volumes, the CBD oil up to the tenth dose (640.5 mg; ~62 mg/kg), the THC oil up to the tenth dose (597.6 mg; ~49 mg/kg), and the CBD/THC oil up to the fifth dose (140.8/96.6 mg CBD/THC; ~13 mg/kg CBD + 9 mg/kg THC). AEs were reported in all dogs across the five groups and the majority (94.9%) were mild. Moderate AEs (4.4% of all AEs) and severe/medically significant AEs (0.8% of all AEs) manifested as constitutional (lethargy, hypothermia) or neurological (ataxia) symptoms and mainly occurred across the two groups receiving oils containing THC (CBD/THC oil or THC oil). Conclusions and clinical significance: Overall, dogs tolerated dose escalation of the CBD oil well, experiencing only mild AEs. The favorable safety profile of ten escalating doses of a CBD oil containing 18.3 to 640.5 mg CBD per dose (~2 mg/kg to ~62 mg/kg) provides comparative evidence that, at our investigated doses, a CBD-predominant oil formulation was safer and more tolerated in dogs than oil formulations containing higher concentrations of THC.
机译:目的:确定升高三种大麻油制剂的剂量的安全性和耐受性,含有主要的CBD,THC或CBD和THC(1.5:1)与安慰剂。设计:随机,安慰剂控制,盲,并行研究。动物:20只健康的比格犬(10名男性,10名女性)。方法:将狗随机分配给五种治疗组中的一个(每组均衡性别):CBD-主要的油,THC - 主要油,CBD / THC-占优势油(1.5:1),向日葵油安慰剂,中链甘油三酯油安慰剂。通过口服饲养计划延长10剂的油,至少三天分离剂量。使用临床观察,体检,完全血统计数,临床化学和血浆大麻素用于评估安全性,耐受性和不良事件(AES)的发生。 AES被评为轻度,中度或严重/医学上显着。结果:CBD-主要油配方的剂量升级显示为安慰剂和比含有THC(CBD / THC油或THC)的油的剂量升级更安全。将安慰剂油送至10个升级的体积,CBD油至第十剂(640.5mg;〜62 mg / kg),THC油到第十剂(597.6 mg;〜49 mg / kg),和CBD / THC油至第五剂量(140.8 / 96.6mg CBD / THC;〜13mg / kg CBD + 9 mg / kg THC)。在五组的所有狗中报道了AES,其中大多数(94.9%)温和。中等AES(占所有AES的4.4%)和严重/医学上有显着的AES(占所有AES的0.8%)表现为宪法(嗜睡,低温)或神经系统(共济失调)症状,主要发生在接受含有THC的油(CBD /)的两组中发生(CBD / THC油或THC油)。结论和临床意义:总体而言,犬耐受剂量升级的CBD油井,经历轻度AES。含有18.3至640.5mg CBD的10个升级剂量的CBD油的有利安全曲线(〜2mg / kg至〜62mg / kg)提供了比较证据,在我们的研究剂量中,CBD主要的油制剂是比含有较高浓度ThC的油制剂更安全和更容许狗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号