首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pharmacology >Meta-Analysis of Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy Combined With Traditional Chinese Medicines for Gastric Cancer Treatment
【24h】

Meta-Analysis of Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy Combined With Traditional Chinese Medicines for Gastric Cancer Treatment

机译:基于紫杉醇的化学疗法的荟萃分析与中药治疗中药治疗

获取原文
       

摘要

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) combined with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy alone for gastric cancer treatment. Literature searches (up to September 25, 2019) were performed using the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Chinese Science and Technology Journals (CQVIP), Wanfang, and China Academic Journals (CNKI) databases. Data from 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with 1,109 participants, were included. The results indicated that, compared with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy alone, the combination of TCMs and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy significantly improved the tumor response rate (TRR; RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.24–1.57; p & 0.001, I ~(2) = 12%), increased the quality of life based on the Karnofsky Performance Scale score (RR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.19–1.96; p & 0.001, I ~(2) = 0%), and reduced the side effects, such as neutropenia (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55–0.84; p & 0.001, I ~(2) = 44%), leukopenia (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54–0.90; p & 0.01, I ~(2) = 40%), thrombocytopenia (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46–0.96; p & 0.05, I ~(2) = 32%), and nausea and vomiting (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32–0.80; p & 0.01, I ~(2) = 85%). Hepatic dysfunction (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.33–1.20; p = 0.16, I ~(2) = 0%), neurotoxicity (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.26–1.55; p = 0.32, I ~(2) = 0%), and anemia (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.40–1.04; p = 0.07, I ~(2) = 0%) were similar between the two groups. Evidence from the meta-analysis suggested that compared with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy alone, the combination of TCMs and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy may increase the TRR, improve quality of life, and reduce multiple chemotherapy-related side effects in gastric cancer patients. Additional rigorously designed large RCTs are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment.
机译:本研究旨在比较中药(TCMS)与紫杉醇的化疗和紫杉醇基化疗同时进行胃癌治疗的疗效和安全性。使用Cochrane图书馆,Embase,PubMed,中国科学和技术期刊(CQVIP),Wanfang和中国学术期刊(CNKI)数据库进行了文学搜索(2019年9月25日)进行了研究。包括14项随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,其中包括1,109名参与者。结果表明,与单独的紫杉醇基化学疗法相比,TCMS和紫杉醇的化疗的组合显着改善了肿瘤反应率(TRR; RR:1.39; 95%CI:1.24-1.57; P <0.001,I〜 (2)= 12%),基于Karnofsky性能等级评分增加了生活质量(RR:1.53; 95%Ci:1.19-1.96; P <0.001,I〜(2)= 0%),减少副作用,如中性粒细胞病(Rr:0.68; 95%Ci:0.55-0.84; P <0.001,I〜(2)= 44%,白细胞减少(RR:0.69; 95%CI:0.54-0.90; P. & 0.01,I〜(2)= 40%),血小板减少症(Rr:0.66; 95%Ci:0.46-0.96; P <0.05,I〜(2)= 32%),恶心和呕吐(RR: 0.50; 95%CI:0.32-0.80; P <0.01,I〜(2)= 85%)。肝功能障碍(RR:0.63; 95%CI:0.33-1.20; P = 0.16,I〜(2)= 0%)神经毒性(RR:0.64; 95%CI:0.26-1.55; P = 0.32,I〜( 2)= 0%)和贫血(RR:0.65; 95%CI:0.40-1.04; P = 0.07,两组之间的I〜(2)= 0%相似。来自荟萃分析的证据表明,与单独的紫杉醇基化疗相比,TCMS和紫杉醇的化疗组合可能增加TRR,提高寿命质量,降低胃癌患者的多种化疗相关副作用。额外的严格设计的大型RCT是确认这种处理的功效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号