...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Physiology >Maximal Voluntary Activation of the Elbow Flexors Is under Predicted by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Compared to Motor Point Stimulation Prior to and Following Muscle Fatigue
【24h】

Maximal Voluntary Activation of the Elbow Flexors Is under Predicted by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Compared to Motor Point Stimulation Prior to and Following Muscle Fatigue

机译:通过在肌肉疲劳之前和之后的电动点刺激相比,通过经颅磁刺激预测肘部屈肌的最大自愿激活。

获取原文
           

摘要

Transcranial magnetic (TMS) and motor point stimulation have been used to determine voluntary activation (VA). However, very few studies have directly compared the two stimulation techniques for assessing VA of the elbow flexors. The purpose of this study was to compare TMS and motor point stimulation for assessing VA in non-fatigued and fatigued elbow flexors. Participants performed a fatigue protocol that included twelve, 15 s isometric elbow flexor contractions. Participants completed a set of isometric elbow flexion contractions at 100, 75, 50, and 25% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) prior to and following fatigue contractions 3, 6, 9, and 12 and 5 and 10 min post-fatigue. Force and EMG of the bicep and triceps brachii were measured for each contraction. Force responses to TMS and motor point stimulation and EMG responses to TMS (motor evoked potentials, MEPs) and Erb's point stimulation (maximal M-waves, Mmax) were also recorded. VA was estimated using the equation: VA% = (1?SITforce/PTforce) × 100. The resting twitch was measured directly for motor point stimulation and estimated for both motor point stimulation and TMS by extrapolation of the linear regression between the superimposed twitch force and voluntary force. MVC force, potentiated twitch force and VA significantly (p < 0.05) decreased throughout the elbow flexor fatigue protocol and partially recovered 10 min post fatigue. VA was significantly (p < 0.05) underestimated when using TMS compared to motor point stimulation in non-fatigued and fatigued elbow flexors. Motor point stimulation compared to TMS superimposed twitch forces were significantly (p < 0.05) higher at 50% MVC but similar at 75 and 100% MVC. The linear relationship between TMS superimposed twitch force and voluntary force significantly (p < 0.05) decreased with fatigue. There was no change in triceps/biceps electromyography, biceps/triceps MEP amplitudes, or bicep MEP amplitudes throughout the fatigue protocol at 100% MVC. In conclusion, motor point stimulation as opposed to TMS led to a higher estimation of VA in non-fatigued and fatigued elbow flexors. The decreased linear relationship between TMS superimposed twitch force and voluntary force led to an underestimation of the estimated resting twitch force and thus, a reduced VA.
机译:经颅磁(TMS)和电机点刺激已用于确定自愿激活(VA)。然而,很少有研究直接比较了用于评估肘部屈肌的VA的两种刺激技术。本研究的目的是比较TMS和电机点刺激,用于评估非疲劳和疲劳的肘部屈曲的VA。参与者进行了疲劳协议,其中包括十二,15秒的等距弯头屈肌收缩。参与者在疲劳收缩3,6,9和12和5和10分钟后完成了100,75,50和25%的最大自愿收缩(MVC)的100,75,50和25%的等距弯头屈曲收缩。为每次收缩测量二头肌和三头肌的力和肌肉。还记录了对TMS和电机点刺激和对TMS(电动机诱发电位,MEP)和ERB的点刺激(最大M波,MMAX)的EMG响应的力响应和EMG响应。使用等式估计VA:Va%=(1?SITFORCE / PTFORCE)×100.通过推断叠加的抽搐力之间的线性回归直接测量静置抽搐,估计电机点刺激和TMS估计。和自愿力量。在整个弯头屈肌疲劳方案中,MVC力显着(P <0.05)显着(P <0.05)下降,并且部分回收10分钟后疲劳后10分钟。与非疲劳和疲劳弯头屈曲中的电机点刺激相比,VA显着(P <0.05)低估了。与TMS叠加的抽搐力相比的电机点刺激显着(P <0.05),在50%MVC下更高,但在75和100%MVC时相似。 TMS叠加的抽搐力与自愿力之间的线性关系显着(P <0.05)随着疲劳降低。在100%MVC下,Triceps /二鼠肌拍摄,二头肌/二头肌肌电学,二头肌/二头肌肌动画,二头肌/三肌肌MEP振幅或BIESP MEP振幅的较大变化。总之,电机点刺激与TMS相反,导致非疲劳和疲劳的肘部屈曲中的VA估计。 TMS叠加的抽搐力和自愿力之间的线性关系降低导致估计静止抽搐力的低估,从而减少VA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号