首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Marine Science >Detections of Whale Vocalizations by Simultaneously Deployed Bottom-Moored and Deep-Water Mobile Autonomous Hydrophones
【24h】

Detections of Whale Vocalizations by Simultaneously Deployed Bottom-Moored and Deep-Water Mobile Autonomous Hydrophones

机译:同时部署底部停泊和深水移动自主水机的鲸鱼发声检测

获取原文
       

摘要

Advances in mobile autonomous platforms for oceanographic sensing, including gliders and deep-water profiling floats, have provided new opportunities for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) of cetaceans. However, there are few direct comparisons of these mobile autonomous systems to more traditional methods, such as stationary bottom-moored recorders. Cross-platform comparisons are necessary to enable interpretation of results across historical and contemporary surveys that use different recorder types, and to identify potential biases introduced by the platform. Understanding tradeoffs across recording platforms informs best practices for future cetacean monitoring efforts. This study directly compares the PAM capabilities of a glider (Seaglider) and a deep-water profiling float (QUEphone) to a stationary seafloor system (High-frequency Acoustic Recording Package, or HARP) deployed simultaneously over a two week period in the Catalina Basin, California, USA. Two HARPs were deployed 4 km apart while a glider and deep-water drifter surveyed within 20 km of the HARPs. Acoustic recordings were analyzed for the presence of multiple cetacean species, including beaked whales, delphinids, and minke whales. Variation in acoustic occurrence at one-minute (beaked whales only), hourly, and daily scales were examined. The number of minutes, hours, and days with beaked whale echolocation clicks were variable across recorders, likely due to differences in the noise floor of each recording system, the spatial distribution of the recorders, and the short detection radius of such a high-frequency, directional signal type. Delphinid whistles and clicks were prevalent across all recorders, and at levels that may have masked beaked whale vocalizations. The number and timing of hours and days with minke whale boing sounds were nearly identical across recorder types, as was expected given the relatively long propagation distance of boings. This comparison provides evidence that gliders and deep-water drifters record cetaceans at similar detection rates to traditional stationary recorders at a single point. The spatiotemporal scale over which these single hydrophone systems record sounds is highly dependent on acoustic features of the sound source. Additionally, these mobile platforms provide improved spatial coverage which may be critical for species that produce calls that propagate only over short distances such as beaked whales.
机译:移动自主平台用于海洋传感的进展,包括滑翔机和深水分析浮动,为鲸蛤的被动声学监测(PAM)提供了新的机会。然而,这些移动自主系统的直接比较很少,以更传统的方法,例如固定的底部停泊记录仪。跨平台比较是必要的,以便在历史和当代调查中解释使用不同记录器类型的历史和当代调查的解释,并识别平台引入的潜在偏差。了解录音平台上的权衡通知未来的缩水仙端监控工作的最佳实践。本研究直接将滑翔机(SeaGlider)和深水分析浮子(Quephone)的PAM能力进行比较到加泰罗纳盆地的两周内同时部署的固定海底系统(高频声学记录封装或竖琴) ,加利福尼亚,美国。两个竖琴竖琴部署了4公里,在仓库20千米内接受调查的滑翔机和深水漂移。分析声学记录用于多种鲸类种类的存在,包括喙鲸,林肽和米克鲸。检查了一分钟(仅喙鲸),每小时和每日鳞片的声学发生变化。拍摄鲸鲸回声分配点击的分钟数,小时和天数在录像机上是可变的,这可能是由于每个记录系统的噪声层的差异,记录器的空间分布以及这种高频的短检测半径,方向信号类型。 Delphinid吹口哨和点击次数普遍存在所有录像机上,并且在可能有掩盖喙鲸鱼发声的级别。距离录像机类型几乎与米克鲸船声音几乎相同的数小时和时间,如预期的鲍瓦斯的传播距离所期望。这一比较提供了一下滑翔机和深水漂移器在单点以类似的检测速率记录鲸类的鲸类。这些单独的单个水听器系统记录声音的时空规模高度依赖声源的声学特征。另外,这些移动平台提供了改进的空间覆盖,这对于产生仅在诸如喙鲸旁的短距离上传播的呼叫的物种可能是至关重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号