...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Microbiology >Evaluation of the Effects of Photodynamic Therapy Alone and Combined with Standard Antifungal Therapy on Planktonic Cells and Biofilms of Fusarium spp. and Exophiala spp.
【24h】

Evaluation of the Effects of Photodynamic Therapy Alone and Combined with Standard Antifungal Therapy on Planktonic Cells and Biofilms of Fusarium spp. and Exophiala spp.

机译:单独的光动力疗法效应的评价,并将标准抗真菌治疗与<斜岩素>纤维化的浮游细胞和生物膜相结合。和<斜视> exophiala SPP。

获取原文

摘要

Infections of Fusarium spp. and Exophiala spp. are often chronic, recalcitrant, resulting in significant morbidity, causing discomfort, disfigurement, social isolation. Systemic disseminations happen in compromised patients, which are often refractory to available antifungal therapies and thereby lead to death. The antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been demonstrated to effectively inactivate multiple pathogenic fungi and is considered as a promising alternative treatment for mycoses. In the present study, we applied methylene blue (8, 16, and 32 μg/ml) as a photosensitizing agent and light emitting diode (635 ± 10 nm, 12 and 24 J/cm~(2)), and evaluated the effects of photodynamic inactivation on five strains of Fusarium spp. and five strains of Exophiala spp., as well as photodynamic effects on in vitro susceptibility to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and amphotericin B, both planktonic and biofilm forms. Photodynamic therapy was efficient in reducing the growth of all strains tested, exhibiting colony forming unit-reductions of up to 6.4 log_(10)and 5.6 log_(10)against planktonic cultures and biofilms, respectively. However, biofilms were less sensitive since the irradiation time was twice longer than that of planktonic cultures. Notably, the photodynamic effects against Fusarium strains with high minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of ≥16, 4-8, 4-8, and 2-4 μg/ml for itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and amphotericin B, respectively, were comparable or even superior to Exophiala spp., despite Exophiala spp. showed relatively better antifungal susceptibility profile. MIC ranges against planktonic cells of both species were up to 64 times lower after aPDT treatment. Biofilms of both species showed high sessile MIC50 (SMIC50) and SMIC80 of ≥16 μg/ml for all azoles tested and variable susceptibilities to amphotericin B, with SMIC ranging between 1 and 16 μg/ml. Biofilms subjected to aPDT exhibited a distinct reduction in SMIC50 and SMIC80 compared to untreated groups for both species, except SMIC80 of itraconazole against Fusarium biofilms. In conclusion, in vitro photodynamic therapy was efficient in inactivation of Fusarium spp. and Exophiala spp., both planktonic cultures and biofilms. In addition, the combination of aPDT and antifungal drugs represents an attractive alternative to the current antifungal strategies. However, further investigations are warranted for the reliable and safe application in clinical practice.
机译:镰刀菌的感染。和exophiala spp。通常是慢性,顽皮症,导致发病率显着,引起不适,毁容,社会隔离。在受损的患者中发生全身散发,这通常是可用的抗真菌疗法的难治性,从而导致死亡。已经证明了抗微生物光动力治疗(APDT)以有效地灭活多种致病性真菌,并且被认为是对岩霉素的有希望的替代治疗方法。在本研究中,我们将亚甲基蓝(8,16和32μg/ ml)施加为光敏剂和发光二极管(635±10nm,12和24J / cm〜(2)),并评估效果光动力灭活五种镰刀菌菌株。和五种exophiala spp菌株,以及对Itroconazole,voriconazole,posaconazole和两性霉素B的体外易感性的光动力学作用,氏菌和生物膜形式。光动力疗法在降低所测试的所有菌株的生长下,显着的菌落形成单位减少6.4 log_(10)和5.6 log_(10)的菌落形成的菌落培养和5.6 log_(10)。然而,生物膜敏感性较小,因为辐照时间是比浮游培养物的两倍。值得注意的是,对于伊丙康唑,voriconazole,posaconazole的≥16,4-8,4-8和2-4μg/ ml的具有高最小抑制浓度(MIC)值的光动力动力学效应分别是可比的尽管如此,甚至优于Exophiala SPP。显示出相对更好的抗真态敏感性曲线。麦克风对抗两种物种的浮游细胞的范围均高达APDT处理后的64倍。两种物种的生物膜显示出高左右的MIC50(SMIC50)和SMIC80,对于所有唑来测试和对两性统计蛋白B的可变敏感性,具有1至16μg/ ml的中间的SMIC80≥16μg/ mL。与两种物种的未处理的组相比,SMIC50和SMIC80的生物膜显示出SMIC50和SMIC80,除了对镰刀菌生物膜的ITRACONAZOLE的SMIC80之外,SMIC50和SMIC80。总之,体外光动力治疗镰刀菌灭活是有效的。和Exophiala spp。,浮游培养和生物膜。此外,APDT和抗真菌药物的组合代表了目前抗真菌策略的有吸引力的替代品。但是,在临床实践中可靠和安全的应用,有权进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号