首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecosystems >Spatial and temporal analysis of beta diversity in the Barro Colorado Island forest dynamics plot, Panama
【24h】

Spatial and temporal analysis of beta diversity in the Barro Colorado Island forest dynamics plot, Panama

机译:巴罗科罗岛森林动力学情节的Beta多样性的空间和时间分析

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundEcologists are interested in assessing the spatial and temporal variation in ecological surveys repeated over time. This paper compares the 1985 and 2015 surveys of the Barro Colorado Forest Dynamics plot (BCI), Panama, divided into 1250 (20?m?×?20?m) quadrats.Methods, spatial analysisTotal beta diversity was measured as the total variance of the Hellinger-transformed community data throughout the BCI plot. Total beta was partitioned into contributions of individual sites (LCBD indices), which were tested for significance and mapped.Results, spatial analysisLCBD indices indicated the sites with exceptional community composition. In 1985, they were mostly found in the swamp habitat. In the 2015 survey, none of the swamp quadrats had significant LCBDs. What happened to the tree community in the interval?Methods, temporal analysisThe dissimilarity in community composition in each quadrat was measured between time 1 (1985) and time 2 (2015). Temporal Beta Indices (TBI) were computed from abundance and presence-absence data and tested for significance. TBI indices can be decomposed into B =?species (or abundances-per-species) losses and C =?species (or abundances-per-species) gains. B-C plots were produced; they display visually the relative importance of the loss and gain components, through time, across the sites.Results, temporal analysisIn BCI, quadrats with significant TBI indices were found in the swamp area, which is shrinking in importance due to changes to the local climate. A published habitat classification divided the BCI forest plot into six habitat zones. Graphs of the B and C components were produced for each habitat group. Group 4 (the swamp) was dominated by species (and abundances-per-species) gains whereas the five other habitat groups were dominated by losses, some groups more than others.ConclusionsWe identified the species that had changed the most in abundances in the swamp between T1 and T2. This analysis supported the hypothesis that the swamp is drying out and is invaded by species from the surrounding area. Analysis of the B and C components of temporal beta diversity bring us to the heart of the mechanisms of community change through time: losses ( B ) and gains ( C ) of species, losses and gains of individuals of various species. TBI analysis is especially interesting in species-rich communities where we cannot examine the changes in every species individually.
机译:背景生理学家有兴趣评估随时间重复的生态调查的空间和时间变化。本文比较了1985年和2015年的Barro Colorado Forest Dynamics Plot(BCI),巴拿马的调查,分为1250(20?M?×20?m)四rats.methods,空间分析β多样性被测量为总方差在整个BCI情节中,Hellinger转换的社区数据。总β被分配到个人网站(LCBD指数)的贡献中,这是考虑的重要性和映射的。结果,空间分析程序指数指出了具有特殊群落组成的网站。 1985年,他们主要在沼泽栖息地找到。在2015年的调查中,沼泽四肢没有重要的LCBD。树木社区在间隔内发生了什么方法,在时间1(1985)和时间2(2015)之间测量每个Quadrat中群落组成中的颞型分析中的不相似性。时间β索引(TBI)由丰富和存在性数据计算,并测试了重要性。 TBI索引可以分解成B =?物种(或丰度)损失和C =?物种(或每种物种)收益。生产B-C图;它们在视觉上显示了损失和增益组件的相对重要性,通过时间,在沼泽地区发现了具有重要TBI指标的四分之三,在沼泽地区发现,由于当地气候的变化,缩小了重要的TBI指数。 。公布的栖息地分类将BCI林绘制分成六个栖息地区域。为每个栖息地组生产B和C组分的图。第4组(沼泽)由物种(和每种物种)占主导地位,而其他五个栖息地团体以损失为主,一些群体比其他人更多。结论我们已经确定了沼泽中最丰富的物种T1和T2之间。该分析支持假设沼泽正在干燥,并通过周围区域的物种侵入。分析时间β多样性的B和C组分使我们通过时间的社区变革机制的核心:各种物种的物种,损失和收益的损失(b)和收益(c)。 TBI分析特别有趣的物种丰富的社区,我们无法单独检查每个物种的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号