首页> 外文期刊>Facta Universitatis. Series Electronics and Energetics >RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT RCIED ACTIVATION SIGNAL RESPONSIVE JAMMING TECHNIQUES AND THEIR COMPARISON TO ACTIVE JAMMING
【24h】

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT RCIED ACTIVATION SIGNAL RESPONSIVE JAMMING TECHNIQUES AND THEIR COMPARISON TO ACTIVE JAMMING

机译:不同RCIED激活信号响应干扰技术的可靠性分析及主动干扰的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper we compared the time required for the successful jamming of remote controlled improvised explosive devices activation using active and responsive jamming methods. As a representative of active jamming method we analyzed jamming signal generation using frequency sweep. For the analysis of the possible activating signal presence based on responsive jamming procedures we first supposed Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) implementation and compared its analysis rate to the rate of sweep jamming. Taking into account the current technology state, it is proved that the time required to achieve the successful jamming relied on FFT analysis may be less than in the case of active sweep jamming. After that we considered pros and cons for energy detector and matched filter detector implementation in responsive jamming. For these two detector types it is shown how to determine the number of analysis blocks to achieve approximately the same number of collected samples as in the case of FFT implementation, starting from the probabilities of false detection and miss of detection.
机译:在本文中,我们使用主动和响应干扰方法比较了遥控简易爆炸装置的成功干扰所需的时间。作为主动干扰方法的代表,我们使用频率扫描分析了干扰信号的产生。为了分析基于响应干扰程序的可能的激活信号存在,我们首先假设快速傅里叶变换(FFT)实现,并将其分析速率与扫描干扰的速率进行了比较。考虑到当前的技术状态,证明实现成功干扰所需的时间依赖于FFT分析可能小于主动扫除干扰的情况下。之后,我们考虑了能量探测器的优缺点和缺点,响应干扰匹配过滤器探测器实现。对于这两种探测器类型,显示了如何确定分析块的数量,以实现大致相同数量的收集的样本,从FFT实现的情况下,从错误检测和检测失误的概率开始。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号