首页> 外文期刊>Global spine journal. >Evaluation of the Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group Algorithms as Part of a Multidisciplinary Spine Tumor Conference
【24h】

Evaluation of the Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group Algorithms as Part of a Multidisciplinary Spine Tumor Conference

机译:评价转移性脊柱疾病多学科工作组算法作为多学科脊柱肿瘤会议的一部分

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group Algorithms are evidence and expert opinion–based strategies for utilizing radiation therapy, interventional radiology procedures, and surgery to treat 5 types of spine metastases: asymptomatic spinal metastases, uncomplicated spinal metastases, stable vertebral compression fractures (VCF), unstable VCF, and metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Evaluation of this set of algorithms in a clinical setting is lacking. The authors aimed to identify rate of treatment adherence to the Working Group Algorithms and, subsequently, update these algorithms based on actual patient management decisions made at a single-institution, multidisciplinary, spine tumor conference. Methods: Patients with metastatic spine disease from primary non-hematologic malignancies discussed at an institutional spine tumor conference from 2013 to 2016 were evaluated. Rates of Working Group Algorithms adherence were calculated for each type of metastasis. Based on the reasons for algorithm nonadherence, and patient outcomes in such cases, updated Working Group Algorithms recommendations were proposed. Results: In total, 154 eligible patients with 171 spine metastases were evaluated. Rates of algorithm adherence were as follows: asymptomatic (67%), uncomplicated (73%), stable VCF (20%), unstable VCF (32%), and MESCC (41%). The most common deviation from the Working Group Algorithms was surgery for MESCC despite poor prognostic factors, but this treatment strategy was supported based on median survival surpassing 6 months in these patients. Conclusions: Adherence to the Working Group Algorithm was lowest for MESCC and VCF patients, but many nonadherent treatments were supported by patient survival outcomes. We proposed updates to the Working Group Algorithm based on these findings.
机译:研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:转移性脊柱疾病多学科工作组算法是利用放射治疗,介入放射学程序和手术治疗5种脊柱转移,无症状脊柱转移,简单的脊柱转移,稳定椎体压缩骨折( VCF),不稳定的VCF和转移性硬膜脊髓压缩(MESCC)。缺乏对该组算法的评估。作者旨在识别对工作组算法的治疗依从性率,随后,根据在单一机构,多学科,脊柱肿瘤会议上进行的实际患者管理决策更新这些算法。方法:评估了2013年至2016年对机构脊柱肿瘤会议讨论的原发性非血液学恶性肿瘤患者的患者。为每种类型的转移计算工作组算法依赖的速率。基于算法不正常的原因,在这种情况下,提出了更新的工作组算法建议。结果:共有154例符合条件的171名脊柱转移患者。算法依从性的速率如下:无症状(67%),简单(73%),稳定的VCF(20%),不稳定的VCF(32%)和MES​​CC(41%)。尽管预后因素差,但是,尽管预后因素差,但是,尽管预后因素差,但基于这些患者的中位存活率支持这种治疗策略,支持这些处理策略。结论:MESCC和VCF患者对工作组算法的依从性最低,但是患者存活结果支持许多非抗静治疗。我们基于这些发现提出了对工作组算法的更新。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号