...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Journal of Health Science >Comparison of the Level of Adherence to Laboratory Quality Management System between Public and Private Secondary Health Facilities in Southern Nigeria
【24h】

Comparison of the Level of Adherence to Laboratory Quality Management System between Public and Private Secondary Health Facilities in Southern Nigeria

机译:尼日利亚南部公共及私立副卫生设施对实验室质量管理体系水平的比较

获取原文

摘要

BACKGROUND: To achieve improved health outcomes of HIV positive patients receiving ART services, quality laboratory services must form an essential part of the services provided. The aim of this study was to compare service quality by assessing the level of adherence to quality system essentials (QSEs) in laboratory services delivered by public and private health institutions in Southern Nigeria. METHODS: This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted among 50 health facilities' laboratories in 5 Southern States (Akwa Ibom, Anambra, Cross River, Edo and Rivers) of Nigeria. Randomly selected sample of secondary health facilities' laboratories (ten per state, and a total of 25 public and 25 private health facilities) receiving equal level of support from the same USAID/PEPFAR implementing partner and had been providing ART services to clients for a minimum of one year, were included in the study. Quarterly Internal quality audit was conducted in the ART Laboratory section of the selected health facilities spanning July 2015 to September 2016. 200 audit reports were checked, cleaned, and analyzed using SPSS version 23. We analyzed changes in mean performance scores over time across 6 quality management essentials using Repeated Measures ANOVA. Results were considered significant at P<0.05. RESULTS: The result of the study showed that the private health facilities laboratory achieved a significantly higher improvement in Facility and Safety score over time (p=0.019) compared to public health facilities. Overall, temporal improvements were recorded in all facilities in three out of the six QSEs (document and record, p=0.045; organization and personnel, p=0.020; equipment, p<0.001) and total laboratory quality score (p=0.004). But there was no significant quarterly difference in performances on QSEs between public and private health facilities laboratories. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that despite receiving the same level of external support, private hospital laboratories adhere better to the quality standards on Facility and safety than public hospital laboratories in Southern Nigeria.
机译:背景:为了实现接受艺术服务的艾滋病毒阳性患者的改善健康结果,优质实验室服务必须形成所提供服务的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是通过评估尼日利亚南部南部公共和私人卫生机构提供的实验室服务中的质量体系必需品(QSES)的遵守水平来比较服务质量。方法:这是尼日利亚5南方50南部国家(Akwa Ibom,Anambra,Cross River,Edo)的50个卫生设施的实验室之间进行的分析横截面研究。随机选择的二级卫生设施实验室样本(每州十个,共有25个公共和25个私人卫生设施)接受相同的USAID / PEPFAR实施合作伙伴的平等支持,并为客户提供最低限度的艺术服务一年,被列入研究中。季度内部质量审计是在2015年7月至2016年7月跨越的所选卫生设施的艺术实验室部分进行的。使用SPSS版本23,检查,清洁和分析200次审计报告。我们分析了6个质量跨越时间的平均性能分数的变化管理要点使用重复措施Anova。结果在P <0.05中被认为是显着的。结果:该研究结果表明,与公共卫生设施相比,私营卫生设施实验室随着时间的推移,随着时间的推移和安全评分的改善(P = 0.019)。总体而言,六QSE中三个中的所有设施中记录了时间改进(文件和记录,P = 0.045;组织和人员,P = 0.020;设备,P <0.001)和总实验室质量得分(P = 0.004)。但公共和私人卫生设施实验室之间QSE的表现没有重大季度。结论:我们的调查结果表明,尽管收到了相同水平的外部支持,私立医院实验室更好地坚持尼日利亚南部公立医院实验室的设施和安全质量标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号