...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Journal of Health Science >Analysis of the Bases of Power of Key Players in the Industry of Novel Psychoactive Substances
【24h】

Analysis of the Bases of Power of Key Players in the Industry of Novel Psychoactive Substances

机译:新型精神物质产业中关键球员权力基础分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The study of novel psychoactive substances (NPS) should be at the intersect of neuroscience, psychology, social science, data science, information and communication technology, policy-making, and legislation. The amalgamation of social science should be widely implemented; the concept of the individual basis of power (authority) has been applied in this study; the aim was to quantify the magnitude of authority for the major players in connection with the NPS industry.MATERIALS & METHODS: Data were collected for NPS researchers and e-vendors. Concerning the NPS scientists, fifty researchers were randomly picked using a random number generator. For each researcher; a power score was calculated; the power scoring is representative for the individual basis of power. There will be a kindred analysis for e-vendors on the darknet; the power scoring will rely on; e-vendor level, trust level, duration of membership in the e-market (vendor's antiquity), number of positive and negative feedbacks from e-customers, number of sold substances, number of subscribers, and e-vendor’s scoring on Grams search engine.RESULTS: Unfortunately, the summative power scores of NPS protagonists were higher than those who oppose and regulate the NPS phenomenon. Terrorist organisations were found to possess the highest power scores due to the additional use of illegal tactics. Power scoring for NPS researchers was highest in Europe, particularly the in the UK and Italy. On the other hand, e-vendors’ power scoring was highest for the AlphaBay e-market of the darknet.CONCLUSION: Principles of social science and psychology should be integrated into the collaborative efforts of NPS researchers. This study proposes a novel method to assess the authority of NPS-related personnel existing within the virtual space of the web; its applications are not limited to NPS researchers and e-vendors but can also be applicable for; e-markets, e-customers and (ab)users, and policy makers.
机译:背景:新型精神活性物质(NPS)的研究应在神经科学,心理学,社会科学,数据科学,信息和通信技术,政策制定和立法的相交。社会科学的合并应该被广泛实施;本研究已应用权力(权威)的个人基础的概念;目的是量化与NPS行业有关的主要参与者的权力范围。关于NPS研究人员和电子供应商收集数据。关于NPS科学家,使用随机数发生器随机挑选五十台研究人员。对于每个研究人员;计算权力分数;功率评分代表了个性的权力基础。 Darknet上的电子供应商将有一种可谓的分析;权力评分将依赖;电子供应商级别,信任级别,电子市场(供应商古代)的持续时间(供应商的古代),来自电子客户的积极和负面反馈的数量,销售物质数量,订阅者数量,以及电子供应商在克搜索引擎上得分。结果:不幸的是,NPS主角的总结电力分数高于反对和调节NPS现象的总结电力分数。由于额外使用非法策略,发现恐怖主义组织具有最高的权力分数。 NPS研究人员的权力评分在欧洲最高,特别是英国和意大利。另一方面,E-Fenders's Power Creading对于Darknet的Alphabay E-Market是最高的.Conclusion:社会科学和心理学的原则应纳入NPS研究人员的合作努力。本研究提出了一种新的方法来评估存在于网络虚拟空间内的NPS相关人员的权限;其应用不限于NPS研究人员和电子供应商,但也可以适用;电子市场,电子客户和(AB)用户,以及决策者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号