...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >A New Therapy for Vitiligo Using Fire Needles: A Systematic Review of Evidence from 3618 Subjects
【24h】

A New Therapy for Vitiligo Using Fire Needles: A Systematic Review of Evidence from 3618 Subjects

机译:使用防火针的白癜风新疗法:从3618个科目的证据进行系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction. Fire needle therapy has been reported as an effective treatment for vitiligo. However, current clinical evidence has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine whether fire needle therapy is effective and safe for treating vitiligo. Methods. Seven databases were searched until October 2019 for randomized controlled trials on fire needle therapy, with and without conventional treatments, versus any type of conventional therapy for treating vitiligo. The RevMan 5.3.5 software was used to perform meta-analysis of the included studies. Results. Forty-seven trials comprising 3618 patients were included. Fire needle combined with conventional vitiligo treatments had a higher efficacy (risk ratio (RR): 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46–1.65, P0.00001 and RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.24–1.61, P0.00001, respectively) and a greater effect on restoring the color of the area of the skin lesion (mean difference (MD): 3.40, 95% CI: 2.11–4.69, P0.00001), increasing the pigment point of vitiligo (MD: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.54–1.13, P0.00001) and improving the cytokine level (MD: 8.10, 95% CI: 6.94–9.27, P0.00001) and effectual time (MD: ?4.76, 95% CI: ?7.33 to ?2.19, P=0.0003) than traditional methods. Limb lesions (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.31–1.95, P0.00001) were more effectively treated when the treatments included fire needles, whereas the therapeutic effect of fire needles on either the head and neck (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.78–1.64, P=0.52) or torso lesions (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.82–1.81, P=0.33) was not significantly different compared to that without fire needles. No statistically significant differences in adverse effects (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.89–1.49, P=0.28) and recurrence rates (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.17–4.92, P=0.91) during the follow-up period were observed between treatment with and without fire needles. Conclusions. Fire needle therapy combined with other conventional treatments is useful in treating vitiligo. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be performed to make a conclusive judgment. This trial is registered with CRD42018094918.
机译:介绍。据报道,消防针疗法为白癜风的有效治疗。但是,目前的临床证据尚未系统地评估。本研究的目的是确定防火针治疗是否有效和安全,对治疗白癜风。方法。搜索七个数据库,直到2019年10月,用于对消防针疗法的随机对照试验,随着常规治疗,与任何类型的常规治疗用于治疗白癜风。 Revman 5.3.5软件用于执行所包含的研究的Meta分析。结果。包括3618名患者的四十七项试验。消防针与常规的白癜风治疗相结合具有更高的疗效(风险比(RR):1.55,95%置信区间(CI):1.46-1.65,P <0.00001和RR:1.41,95%CI:1.24-1.61,P < 0.00001分别为0.00001)和对恢复皮肤病变面积的颜色更大的效果(平均差异(MD):3.40,95%CI:2.11-4.69,P <0.00001),增加白癜风的颜料点(MD: 0.83,95%CI:0.54-1.13,P <0.00001)并改善细胞因子水平(MD:8.10,95%CI:6.94-9.27,P <0.00001)和有效时间(MD:?4.76,95%CI:? 7.33至?2.19,p = 0.0003)比传统方法。当治疗包括防火针时,更有效地治疗肢体病变(RR:1.60,95%CI:1.31-1.95,P <0.00001),而火针在头部和颈部的治疗效果(RR:1.13,95% CI:0.78-1.64,P = 0.52)或躯干病变(RR:1.22,95%CI:0.82-1.81,P = 0.33)与没有防火针相比没有显着差异。在后续期间,没有统计学上的不良反应差异(RR:1.15,95%CI:0.89-1.49,P = 0.28)和复发率(RR:0.90,95%CI:0.17-4.92,P = 0.91)在用和无火针的治疗之间观察到。结论。消防针治疗与其他常规治疗相结合可用于治疗白癜风。应进行更大样本尺寸的进一步研究以进行确凿的判断。此试验在CRD42018094918注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号