...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology >The potential cardioprotective effects of Febuxostat versus Cilostazol on Isoproterenol induced cardiac dysfunction in rats
【24h】

The potential cardioprotective effects of Febuxostat versus Cilostazol on Isoproterenol induced cardiac dysfunction in rats

机译:Febuxostat潜在的心脏保护作用与西洛替唑对异丙醇诱导大鼠心脏功能障碍的潜在心脏保护作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Myocardial infarction causes an acute condition of necrosis of the myocardium resulting in increased production of free radicals and decreased levels of antioxidants. It was proposed that Febuxostat reduced myocardial oxidative stress and suppressed apoptosis. Cilostazol used to treat claudication has a growing evidence, suggesting that Cilostazol could be cardioprotective. This work aims to highlight the potential protective effect of pretreatment with Febuxostat vs. Cilostazol on Isoproterenol induced cardiac toxicity in rats. Thirty-six male albino rats were divided into 6 groups (6 rats each); control, Febuxostat, Cilostazol, Isoproterenol, Febuxostat+Isoproterenol and Cilostazol+Isoproterenol groups. Cardiotoxicity was induced by subcutaneous injection of Isoproterenol 100 mg ? kg on the 13th and14th day of the experiment. ECG parameters were assayed. Measurement of cardiac TNF-α level, serum troponin and histopathological changes were also performed. Pretreatment with Febuxostat led to significant increase in heart rate and a significant decrease in QT and QTC intervals compared to Cilostazol. Cilostazol led to significant reduction in TNF-α and insignificant reduction of cardiac troponin levels compared to Febuxostat. Isoproterenol led to arrhythmia in 33% of rats, Febuxostat led to arrhythmia in 50% of rats, while Cilostazol did not lead to any arrhythmias. Pretreatment with Febuxostat and Cilostazol led to significant improvement in the pathological changes caused by Isoproterenol; however, there was no statistically significant difference between them. Pretreatment with Cilostazol is more cardioprotective than Febuxostat as it led to more reduction in TNF-α without increasing arrhythmias or affecting QT and QTC intervals as compared to Febuxostat.
机译:心肌梗死导致心肌坏死的急性病症导致自由基产生增加,抗氧化剂水平降低。提出了Febuxostat降低了心肌氧化应激和抑制细胞凋亡。西利替唑用于治疗跛行具有越来越慢的证据,表明西洛替唑可以是心脏保护的。这项工作旨在突出与西枯草与西洛替唑对大鼠异丙醇诱导心脏毒性的潜在保护效果。将三十六只雄性白化大鼠分成6组(每只6只大鼠);对照,Febuxostat,西洛司唑,异丙肾上腺素,费和溶液+异丙肾上腺素和西洛司唑+异丙肾上腺素组。通过皮下注射异丙肾上腺素100mg诱导心脏毒性? kg在实验的第13和第14天。测定ECG参数。还进行了心脏TNF-α水平,血清肌钙蛋白和组织病理学变化的测量。与西霉唑相比,对Febuxostat的预处理导致心率显着增加,QT和QTC间隔的显着降低。与Febuxostat相比,西洛司唑导致TNF-α和心肌肌钙蛋白水平微不足道的降低。异丙酚导致33%的大鼠的心律失常,飞布·抑制患者在50%的大鼠中导致了心律失常,而西洛塞唑不会导致任何心律失常。对食品抑制剂和西洛司唑的预处理导致异丙酚引起的病理变化的显着改善;但是,它们之间没有统计学上的显着差异。与飞司唑的预处理比Febuxostat更多的心脏保护剂,因为它导致TNF-α更加降低而不增加心律失常或影响与Febuxostat相比的Qt和QTC间隔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号