首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy International Open >Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related early neoplasia after standard endoscopic management is feasible and safe
【24h】

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related early neoplasia after standard endoscopic management is feasible and safe

机译:在标准内窥镜管理后,巴雷特食管(BE) - 后期肿瘤的内窥镜粘膜(ESD)是可行和安全的

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and study aims?There is little data on the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a salvage treatment for Barrett’s esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia after standard endoscopic treatments. Patients and methods?A multicenter retrospective analysis on patients who underwent ESD for BE was performed. The primary endpoint was effectiveness of obtaining en-bloc resection in salvage as compared to non-salvage treatments. Results?Median age was 71 (IQR 55?–?79) years. Twelve (37%) of 32 patients underwent salvage ESD. Median resection time was 100 (IQR 60?–?136) minutes. En-bloc resection was achieved in 31 patients (97?%). Complete R0 resection was obtained in 75?% in the salvage group and 80?% in the non-salvage group (P?=?1.00). In seven patients (22?%), the pre-ESD diagnosis was upgraded on post-ESD histopathology (1 low-grade dysplasia to high grade dysplasia [HGD], 4 HGD to early esophageal carcinoma (EAC), and 2 intramucosal EAC to invasive EAC). No perforations occurred in either group.?Two late adverse events occurred, both in the salvage group (P?=?0.133). Delayed bleeding occurred in a patient who had just resumed warfarin and stricture occurred in a patient who had a circumferential resection requiring serial dilation and stent placement. Conclusions?Our cohort study demonstrated that ESD as salvage therapy for BE related neoplasia is feasible and safe, achieving similar high rates of en-bloc resection and complete R0 resection as in treatment-na?ve patients. Referral to an expert center performing ESD should be considered for patients with recurrence or progression following endoscopic mucosal resection or ablation therapy.
机译:背景和研究旨在?内窥镜粘膜粘膜解剖(ESD)的可行性和安全性数据很少,作为Barrett食管(在标准内窥镜治疗后的肿瘤后的销售处理。患者和方法?进行对患者进行的患者进行多中心回顾性分析。与非挽救治疗相比,初级终点是获得销售中的en-Bloc切除术的有效性。结果?中位年龄为71(IQR 55? - ?79)年。 12名患者的12名(37%)接受了拯救eSD。中位数切除时间为100(IQR 60? - ?136)分钟。在31例患者中达到了en-Bloc切除术(97岁)。完全R0切除在救助组中获得75℃,80℃的非救生组(P?= 1.00)。在7名患者(22岁)中,ESD前诊断在ESD后组织病理学(1种低级发育性对高级发育不全性[HGD],4 HGD至早期食管癌(EAC)和2个暗层患者诊断侵入eac)。在任何一组中没有发生穿孔。在救助组中发生了晚期不良事件(P?= 0.133)。延迟出血发生在刚刚恢复华法林和狭窄的患者中发生的患者发生,患者需要圆周切除,需要连续扩张和支架放置。结论?我们的队列研究表明,ESD作为有关肿瘤的救生疗法是可行和安全的,实现了类似的en-Bloc切除率和完整的R0切除,如治疗 - Na've患者。对于在内镜粘膜切除或消融治疗后复发或进展的患者,应考虑进行执行ESD的专家中心的转诊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号