...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Power >Sustainability Evaluation of Hybrid Renewable Electrification Alternatives in Malawi’s Villages Using a Multi-Criteria Approach
【24h】

Sustainability Evaluation of Hybrid Renewable Electrification Alternatives in Malawi’s Villages Using a Multi-Criteria Approach

机译:利用多标准方法,马拉维村混合再生电气化替代品的可持续性评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Off-grid villages in Malawi continue to suffer from limited access to electricity due to under performance of the installed generation systems. This is largely attributable to inappropriate methodologies applied for sizing the systems that ignore sustainability indicators (technical, economic and environmental) as well as communities’ existing energy demand and future projections. This paper presents the sustainability evaluation of five types of hybrid renewable energy systems considered for deployment in three villages in Malawi. The study employed a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) based on TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution) algorithm. The PV-Battery (PB), PV-Wind-Battery (PWB), PV-Diesel-Battery (PDB), Wind-Diesel-Battery (WDB) and PV-Wind-Diesel-Battery (PWDB) systems were evaluated. The study envisaged to identify suitable systems for deployment in each of the villages based on the pre-set technical, economic and environmental criteria. Under these criteria, the sub-criteria were identified which included; renewable fraction, excess electricity, total system capacity, battery autonomy, total electrical production, return on investment, simple payback, Net Present Cost (NPC), initial capital cost, operating cost, Cost of Energy (COE) and carbon dioxide (CO_(2)) emissions. The indicative values for these sub-criteria were derived from the optimization results from HOMER simulation software. The TOPSIS analysis entailed definition of energy alternatives and criteria, formulation of the decision matrices, normalization of the decision matrices, generation of weighted normalized matrices, determination of ideal and negative ideal solutions, calculation of relative separations from the ideal and negative ideal solutions and determination of relative closeness of each energy alternative to the ideal solution. For Chigunda, the PWB system was the most suitable with the highest closeness to ideal solution (C_(i)) value of 0.749 while for Mdyaka and Kadzuwa; the best alternative was the PB configuration with the highest C_(i )values of 0.708 and 0.717 respectively.
机译:马拉维的离网村继续遭受由于已安装的发电系统的性能而受到限制的电力。这主要是归因于适用于忽视可持续发展指标(技术,经济和环境)以及社区现有能源需求和未来预测的系统的不当方法。本文介绍了在马拉维三个村庄部署的五种混合可再生能源系统的可持续性评估。该研究采用了基于TOPSIS的多标准决策分析(MCDA)(通过与理想解决方案的相似性偏好的技术)算法。评估PV电池(PB),PV-风电池(PWB),PV柴油电池(PWB),风柴油 - 电池(WDB)和PV-风柴油电池(PWDB)系统。该研究设想根据预先设定的技术,经济和环境标准确定每个村庄部署的合适系统。在这些标准下,鉴定了包括的子标准;可再生的分数,电力过多,系统能力,电池自主权,总电气生产,投资回报,简单的回报,净额成本(NPC),初始资本成本,运营成本,能源成本(COE)和二氧化碳成本(CO_( 2))排放。这些子标准的指示值来自来自HOMER仿真软件的优化结果。 TopSIS分析需要定义能量替代和标准,决策矩阵的制定,决策矩阵的标准化,加权标准化矩阵的产生,理想和负面理想解决方案的确定,从理想和负面理想解决方案的相对分离的计算每个能量的相对接近理想解决方案。对于Chigunda,PWB系统最适合于最高的近距离对Mdyaka和Kadzuwa的理想解决方案(C_(i))值为0.749;最佳替代方案是PB配置,C_(i)值分别为0.708和0.717。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号