首页> 外文期刊>EFSA Journal >Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives
【24h】

Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post‐market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives

机译:对含有工程基因驱动器的转基因昆虫的分子表征,环境风险评估和市场后环境监测的现有EFSA指南的充分性和充足性评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Advances in molecular and synthetic biology are enabling the engineering of gene drives in insects for disease vector/pest control. Engineered gene drives (that bias their own inheritance) can be designed either to suppress interbreeding target populations or modify them with a new genotype. Depending on the engineered gene drive system, theoretically, a genetic modification of interest could spread through target populations and persist indefinitely, or be restricted in its spread or persistence. While research on engineered gene drives and their applications in insects is advancing at a fast pace, it will take several years for technological developments to move to practical applications for deliberate release into the environment. Some gene drive modified insects (GDMIs) have been tested experimentally in the laboratory, but none has been assessed in small‐scale confined field trials or in open release trials as yet. There is concern that the deliberate release of GDMIs in the environment may have possible irreversible and unintended consequences. As a proactive measure, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has been requested by the European Commission to review whether its previously published guidelines for the risk assessment of genetically modified animals (EFSA, 2012 and 2013), including insects (GMIs), are adequate and sufficient for GDMIs, primarily disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species, for deliberate release into the environment. Under this mandate, EFSA was not requested to develop risk assessment guidelines for GDMIs. In this Scientific Opinion, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) concludes that EFSA's guidelines are adequate, but insufficient for the molecular characterisation (MC), environmental risk assessment (ERA) and post‐market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GDMIs. While the MC,ERA and PMEM of GDMIs can build on the existing risk assessment framework for GMIs that do not contain engineered gene drives, there are specific areas where further guidance is needed for GDMIs.
机译:分子和合成生物学的进步使得能够在昆虫中的基因驱动器进行疾病载体/害虫控制。设计的基因驱动器(其自身继承)可以设计用于抑制杂交目标群体或用新的基因型修饰它们。根据工程化基因驱动系统,理论上,感兴趣的遗传修改可以通过目标人群传播,无限期地持续,或者在其传播或持久性中受到限制。虽然对工程基因驱动器的研究及其在昆虫中的应用正在以快速的步伐推进,但工艺发展需要多年的时间来迁移到实际应用程序,以便故意释放到环境中。一些基因驱动改性昆虫(GDMI)在实验室进行了测试,但没有在小规模狭窄的现场试验或公开释放试验中进行评估。担心环境中GDMI的故意释放可能具有可能的不可逆转和意外的后果。作为一个积极的措施,欧洲委员会要求欧洲食品安全机构(EFSA)审查其先前已公布的基因改性动物(EFSA,2012和2013)的风险评估指南,包括昆虫(GMIS)是适当且足以用于GDMI,主要是疾病载体,农业害虫和侵入性物种,用于蓄意释放到环境中。根据此授权,未要求EFSA为GDMI制定风险评估指南。在这一科学意见中,基因改性生物(GMO)小组得出结论,EFSA的指导方针是足够的,但分子表征(MC),环境风险评估(时代)和GDMI的后市场环境监测(PMEM)不足。虽然GDMI的MC,ERA和PMEM可以在现有的基因GMIS上建立不包含工程基因驱动器的GMIS的现有风险评估框架,但是GDMIS需要进一步指导的具体领域。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号