首页> 外文期刊>Isra Medical Journal >Comparison between immediate effects of soft tissue mobilization along with stretching exercises and without stretching exercises in patients with mechanical neck pain
【24h】

Comparison between immediate effects of soft tissue mobilization along with stretching exercises and without stretching exercises in patients with mechanical neck pain

机译:软组织动员与机械颈部疼痛患者伸展锻炼立即影响的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To measure whether soft tissue mobilization along with stretching exercises improves level of disability or stretchingexercises alone increases neck range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.Study Design: A randomized comparative trialPlace and Duration: At Royal Institute of Medical Sciences Physiotherapy Clinic Multan, in four months from 1st January 2017 to 30thApril 2017.Methodology: Fifty patients who met inclusion criteria were randomly placed into two groups. Group A, received hot pack and neckstretching exercises and group B, received hot pack, neck stretching exercises and soft tissue mobilization (STM). Immediate effectspost intervention was documented by measuring range of motion (ROM) using goniometer; pain intensity was measure by VisualAnalogue Scale (VAS), Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC) and disability scores on Neck disability index (NDI) 2-4 days posttreatment.Results: The STM group reported a significant improvement on the GROC (p=0.001) immediately after treatment (post treatment).There was no difference between groups for the NDI post-test values, there is statistical insignificance (P=0.408) between treatmentand control group on disability. There is statistical significance (P=0.000) between treatment and control group in pain that wasmeasured by VAS.Conclusion: Soft Tissue Mobilization is effective to relief neck pain immediately and improves range of motion but not up to a mark.Moreover, Soft Tissue Mobilization does not improve levels of disability as compare to the stretching exercises.
机译:目的:测量软组织动员是否与拉伸锻炼一起改善残疾水平或仅仅增加了机械颈部疼痛患者的颈部运动水平.STUDY设计:随机的比较试用期和持续时间:在皇家医学科学学会诊所MULTEN ,在2017年1月1日至30日至2017年的四个月内。方法:将纳入标准符合纳入标准的五十名患者随机置于两组。 A组,接收的热包和颈部锻炼和B组,接收热包,颈部拉伸锻炼和软组织动员(STM)。通过使用焦极计测量运动范围(ROM)来记录即时EffectionSpost干预;疼痛强度由VisualAnalogue Scale(VAS),变化量表(GROC)的全球评级和颈部残疾指数(NDI)的残疾分数2-4天后。结果:STM集团报告了GROC的显着改善(P =治疗后立即(后处理)立即进行,在试验值后的群体之间没有区别,治疗和对照组对残疾之间存在统计微不足道(p = 0.408)。通过VAS般的疼痛治​​疗和对照组之间存在统计学意义(p = 0.000)。结论:软组织动员立即有效地释放颈部疼痛,并提高运动范围,但不达到马克.OROVER,软组织动员与伸展锻炼相比,不会提高残疾水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号