首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Dentistry >Outcome of Chair-Side Dental Fear Treatment: Long-Term Follow-Up in Public Health Setting
【24h】

Outcome of Chair-Side Dental Fear Treatment: Long-Term Follow-Up in Public Health Setting

机译:椅子端牙科恐惧治疗的结果:公共卫生环境的长期随访

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim. Purpose of this practice and data-based study was to evaluate the outcome of dental fear treatment of patients referred to the Clinic for Fearful Dental Patients (CFDP) in the primary oral health care, City of Oulu, Finland, during period 2000–2005. Methods. A psychological approach including behavioral interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy (BT/CBT) was used for all participants combined with conscious sedation or dental general anesthesia (DGA), if needed. The outcome was considered successful if later dental visits were carried out without any notifications in the patient records of behavioral problems or sedation. Data collection was made in 2006; the average length of the observation period from the last visit in the CFPD to data collection was 2?y 3?m (SD 1?y 5?m). All information was available for 163 patients (mean age 8.9?y at referral). Study population was dominated by males (58.0%). Cause for referrals was mostly dental fear (81.0%) or lack of cooperation. Results. The success rate was 69.6% among females and 68.1% among males. Success seemed to be (p=0.053) higher for those treated in ≤12?years compared with the older ones. The participants, without need for dental general anesthesia (DGA) in the CFDP, had significantly a higher success rate (81.4%) compared with those who did (54.8%, p0.001). Use of conscious oral sedation (p=0.300) or N2O (p=0.585) was not associated with the future success. Conclusions. A chair-side approach seems successful in a primary health care setting for treating dental fear, especially in early childhood. Use of sedation seems not to improve the success rate.
机译:目标。这种做法和基于数据的研究是评估牙科恐惧治疗患者的牙科恐惧治疗的结果,在2000 - 2005年期间在芬兰的奥卢市奥卢市的主要口腔医疗保健中提到临床。方法。一种心理方法,包括行为干预和认知行为治疗(BT / CBT),如果需要,所有参与者结合有意识的镇静剂或牙科全身麻醉(DGA)。如果在没有任何通知的行为问题或镇静记录的情况下进行后期牙科访问,则认为结果是成功的。数据收集是在2006年制定的;从CFPD的最后一次访问到数据收集的观察期的平均长度为2?Y 3?M(SD 1?Y 5?M)。所有信息可用于163名患者(平均年龄为8.9岁)。学习人口由男性占主导地位(58.0%)。推荐的原因主要是牙齿恐惧(81.0%)或缺乏合作。结果。女性的成功率为69.6%,68.1%。对于那些与较旧的人在≤12岁的人进行比较时,成功似乎(p = 0.053)更高。与CFDP中的牙科全身麻醉(DGA)的参与者与那些(54.8%,P <0.001)相比具有较高的成功率(81.4%)。使用意识口腔镇静(P = 0.300)或N2O(P = 0.585)与未来的成功无关。结论。椅子方面的方法似乎是在治疗牙科恐惧的主要医疗保健环境中成功,特别是在童年早期。使用镇静似乎没有提高成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号