We analyze the annals of the 1878 Agricultural Congresses held in July in Rio de Janeiro and in October in Recife. We compare the different types of call for these events. We then analyze the discussions about the lack of capital available to the plantations, as well as the suggestions to stimulate the supply of credit to the planters. Finally, we point out similarities and differences of position between the planters in the “South” and the “North”, such as the participation of the state in financing the plantation economy. Understood by the majority of congressmen as indispensable, this participation was seen, in “the North”, as the due payment of a historical debt. From the perspective of “the South”, where coffee production predominated, the plantation was understood as “the patient seeing the doctor” and the Government “the doctor who must diagnose the disease and prescribe the remedy.”
展开▼
机译：我们分析了7月举行的1878年农业大会的年度在Rio de Janeiro和10月在累累累累累。我们比较这些事件的不同类型的呼叫。然后，我们分析了对种植园缺乏资本的讨论，以及刺激对播种者的信贷供应的建议。最后，我们指出了“南方”和“北方”中的种植者之间的位置的相似之处和差异，例如国家在融资种植园经济中的参与。大多数国会议员明白是不可或缺的，在“北方”中看到了这一参与，作为历史债务的应税。从“南方”的角度来看，咖啡生产占主导地位，种植园被理解为“患者看到医生”和政府“的医生，必须诊断疾病并规定补救措施。”
展开▼
