...
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian Journal of Microbiology >Comparative evaluation of hydrogen peroxide sporicidal efficacy by different standard test methods
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of hydrogen peroxide sporicidal efficacy by different standard test methods

机译:不同标准试验方法对过氧化氢磷酸效力的比较评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objectives: There are different sporicidal standard tests with various specifications to deal with products that are claimed for sporicidal activity. The aim of this study was to compare the 7% H 2 O 2 sporicidal efficacy against Bacillus subtilis spores using different standard test methods. Materials and Methods: The 7% H 2 O 2 sporicidal efficacy against Bacillus subtilis spores was determined according to the AOAC MB-15-04 standard of carrier test and two standard suspension tests (BS EN 13704, AFNOR NF 72-230) in both clean and dirty conditions and by using different interfering substances including bovine serum albumin, yeast extract and skimmed milk. Results: The results of suspension tests with 3 × 10 5 and 2 × 10 7 CFU/ml of B. subtilis spore concentration demonstrated that the higher spore counts lead to lower efficacy of 7% H 2 O 2 . Also, the sporicidal activity of 7% H 2 O 2 was reduced in the presence of interfering substances. Bovine serum albumin, yeast, and skimmed milk showed similar interfering effects in suspension test with 3 × 10 5 CFU/ml. While, in suspension tests with higher initial spore count (2 × 10 7 CFU/ml) severity of interfering effects were intensified and distinct. Our results indicated that the carrier sporicidal test in comparison with suspension tests required more contact time to kill B. subtilis spores. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that it is reasonable to use interfering substances and inoculated carriers in accordance with actual conditions of product usage in a sporicidal test. Interfering substances may reduce the contact surface between H 2 O 2 and test spores; therefore, the sporicidal efficacy of H 2 O 2 was diminished. So applying suspension test in clean condition to verify the claim of sporicidal activity is strongly discouraged.
机译:背景和目标:有不同的刺激性标准测试,各种规格可以处理据称刺激性活动的产品。本研究的目的是使用不同的标准试验方法比较针对枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的7%H 2 O 2 Sporicatic疗效。材料和方法:根据AOAC MB-15-04标准的载体试验标准和两种标准悬浮试验(BS EN 13704,AFNOR NF 72-230),测定对枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的7%H 2 O 2对枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的刺激性疗效清洁和肮脏的条件,通过使用不同的干扰物质,包括牛血清白蛋白,酵母提取物和脱脂牛奶。结果:3×10 5和2×10 7 CFU / ml B的悬浮液试验结果表明,较高的孢子计数导致7%H 2 O 2的效果较低。而且,在干扰物质存在下减少了7%H 2 O 2的孢子醛活性。牛血清白蛋白,酵母和脱脂牛奶在悬浮试验中显示出类似的干扰效果,3×10 5 cfu / ml。虽然,在具有较高初始孢子数的悬浮试验中(2×10 7 CFU / ml)发生干扰效应的严重程度并截然不同。我们的研究结果表明,与悬浮试验相比,载体刺激性试验需要更多的接触时间来杀死B.枯草芽孢杆菌孢子。结论:本研究的结果表明,根据刺激性试验中的产品用途的实际条件,使用干扰物质和接种载体是合理的。干扰物质可以减少H 2 O 2和测试孢子之间的接触表面;因此,H 2 O 2的刺激性疗效减少了。因此,在清洁条件下施用悬浮试验以验证汗腺量活动的索赔强烈泄气。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号