...
首页> 外文期刊>International Practice Development Journal >How do we consider the impact of clinical supervisor education? A participatory literature review
【24h】

How do we consider the impact of clinical supervisor education? A participatory literature review

机译:我们如何考虑临床监督教育的影响?参与式文献综述

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background: This research forms the initial part of a PhD research study, based in the critical paradigm, with an emphasis on developing education strategies that impact on learning in the non-classroom setting. The focus of this article is the education required to enable clinical supervisors to undertake their role supporting nursing students in clinical practice. Aims: There are two aims of this literature review. First, to determine what peer-reviewed, published literature reveals concerning effective learning and teaching strategies for clinical supervisor education. Second, to gain an understanding from a group of clinical supervisors of their perspective on the literature review findings, and develop recommendations for their preparatory education. Methods: This research used a literature review with a participatory phase built in. A traditional review was completed and then extended to include the clinical supervisors reviewing the findings, providing their perspectives and developing recommendations for their own future education development. Findings: During phase one of the research, 22 peer-reviewed articles were included for review and four themes identified and explored. In phase two, 36 clinical supervisors provided their perspectives on these themes. They highlighted the need for a variety of modalities for education to ensure supervisors have shared values, knowledge and skills to work in clinical practice with nursing students and, more broadly, to influence the development of person-centred learning cultures. Conclusions: The literature review revealed a limited amount of peer-reviewed literature. Further, there is little published literature on person-centred situated education for clinical supervisors. When evidence is shared with clinical supervisors, they can contribute to designing their education needs.
机译:摘要背景:本研究表明了基于批评范式的博士研究研究的最初部分,重点是发展教育策略,影响非课堂环境中的学习。本文的重点是使临床监督能够在临床实践中为护理学生提供支持作用的教育。目的:这篇文献综述有两个目的。首先,确定对临床监督教育有效学习和教学策略的同行评审,出版的文献揭示了什么。其次,从一群临床监督员对文献审查调查结果进行了解,并为其筹备教育制定建议。方法:本研究采用了一个内置的参与阶段的文献综述。填写了传统评论,然后扩展到包括审查调查结果的临床监管机构,为自己的未来教育发展提供他们的观点和发展建议。调查结果:在研究中的一期间,包括22条同行评审条款用于审查和确定和探索的四个主题。在第二阶段,36名临床监督员为这些主题提供了他们的观点。他们强调了各种教育方式的需要,以确保监督员共用价值,知识和技能,以便在临床实践中与护理学生一起工作,更广泛地影响人们以人为本的学习文化的发展。结论:文献综述显示了有限的同行评审文献。此外,临床监督员以人为本的位于教育方面几乎没有出版的文献。当与临床监督员共享证据时,他们可以为设计其教育需求做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号