首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Statistics and Probability >Independent, Tough Identical Results The Class of Tweedie on Power Variance Functions and the Class of Bar-Lev and Enis on Reproducible Natural Exponential Families
【24h】

Independent, Tough Identical Results The Class of Tweedie on Power Variance Functions and the Class of Bar-Lev and Enis on Reproducible Natural Exponential Families

机译:独立,艰难的相同结果对电力方差函数的TweEdie等类以及可重复的自然指数家庭中的酒吧 - lev和enis类

获取原文
           

摘要

The Rao-Blackwell theorem has had a fundamental role in statistical theory. However, as opposed to what seems natural, Rao and Blackwell did not investigate and write the theorem jointly. In fact, they both published the same result independently, two years apart. Indeed, as C.R. Rao writes in Wikipedia: 'the result on one parameter case was published by Rao (1945) in the Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society and by Blackwell (1947) in The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. Only Lehmann and Sche e (1950) called the result as Rao-Blackwell theorem'. Forty years later, a situation very similar to the previous one seems to have happened. Tweedie (1984) in a paper published in a proceedings to a conference held in Calcutta and Bar-Lev and Enis (1986) in a paper published in The Annals of Statistics both presented for the first time, albeit two years apart, independently and in di erent contexts, the class of natural exponential families having power variance functions (NEF-PVFs). Tweedie's results were then mentioned by Jorgensen (1987) in his fundamental paper on exponential dispersion models published in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. Jorgensen, however, mentioned also other researchers, including Bar-Lev and Enis, as dealt with the same problem. Nonetheless, Jorgensen (1987) stated in his paper that 'The most complete study' of NEF-PVFs was given by Tweedie (1984), a statement which has led to naming the class of NEF-PVFs as the Tweedie class. This statement of Jorgensen is entirely and utterly incorrect. Accordingly, one of the goals of this note is to 'prove' such incorrectness. Based on this 'proof' it will be evident, so I trust, that both Bar-Lev and Enis should have received the appropriate credit by re-naming the class of NEF-PVFs via the exploitation of the names of Tweedie, Bar-Lev and Enis. This would resemble the dignified and elegant manner Lehmann and Sche e acted on the Rao-Blackwell Theorem. Notwithstanding, the main aim of the note is to encourage young researchers to present their results with self-confidence and to get the credit they deserve.
机译:Rao-Blackwell定理在统计理论中发挥了重要作用。然而,与似乎自然一样,RAO和Blackwell没有共同调查和写定理。事实上,他们都在独立出版了相同的结果,两年分开。实际上,正如C.R. Rao在维基百科写作:“一个参数案件的结果由Rao(1945)在Calcutta数学社会和Blackwell(1947)在数学统计数据中发表。只有Lehmann和Sche E(1950)叫做Rao-Blackwell定理的结果。四十年后,似乎发生了与前一个非常相似的情况。 Tweedie(1984年)在一份发表于在加尔各答举行的会议的诉讼程序中发表的会议讨论,该文件在统计第一次出现的统计数据上发表的论文中,尽管两年间,独立地和DI ERENT的上下文,具有电源方差功能的自然指数系列(NEF-PVF)。 Jorgensen(1987)提到了Tweedie的结果,他在皇家统计社会杂志上发表的指数分散模型中提到了基本论文,然而,其他研究人员也提到包括Bar-Lev和Enis,如涉及同样的问题。尽管如此,Jorgensen(1987)在他的论文中表示,“Nef-PVFS的最完整的研究”是由Tweedie(1984)给出的,这是一个导致将Nef-PVF类作为Tweedie课程命名的声明。这张jorgensen的陈述完全和完全不正确。因此,本备注的目标之一是“证明”这种不正确性。基于这个“证明”它将很明显,所以我相信,通过利用Tweedie,Bar-Lev的名称重新命名一类Nef-PVF,这两个律师都应获得适当的信誉和恩伊斯。这对Lehmann和Sche E的尊严和优雅的方式类似于Rao-Blackwell定理。尽管如此,备注的主要目的是鼓励年轻的研究人员以自信地展示他们的结果,并获得应得的信贷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号