首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Science, Technology and Society >Analysis of Interest Deduction Rules Under Ethiopian Corporate Tax System
【24h】

Analysis of Interest Deduction Rules Under Ethiopian Corporate Tax System

机译:埃塞俄比亚企业税制下的利息扣除规则分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The use of third party and related party interest is one of the profit-shifting techniques available in international tax planning. The fluidity and fungibility of money make it a relatively simple exercise to adjust the mix of debt and equity in a controlled company. When the level of debt capital is much greater than the equity capital of the company thin capitalization occurs. Nowadays, thin capitalization is one of the major challenges to the corporate tax system of Ethiopia. Thin capitalization reduces government income from tax by increasing deductible interest paid or payable on the debt. To address this problem, Ethiopia has implemented tax rules restricting the deductibility of interest payments. This article aims to qualitatively examine the interest deduction rules under the Ethiopian income tax regimes through a qualitative analysis of existing literatures and laws. To this end, the analysis start unfolding the conceptual framework of interest deduction and its rules followed by an examination of interest deduction rules of Ethiopia. As the finding has revealed, the newly enacted federal income law has taken a big step in tightening the interest deduction rules through the adoption of debt-to-equity ratio and arm’s length approach to determine the maximum debt on which interest deductible. In doing so, the income tax rules of Ethiopia incorporated the indirect interest deduction rule which indirectly limits the amount interest on which is deduction is allowable. In addition to this, the withholding tax imposed on interest paid to non-resident and limit on maximum deductible interest rates are adopted as an interest deduction approach to supplement arm’s length and debt-to-equity ratio to protect tax base erosion. Despite these positive developments, the Ethiopian tax law has failed to recognize direct interest deduction rules which directly limit the maximum interest on which deduction is allowed. Nowadays, interest stripping rule is widely appreciated as the modern and most effective approach that directly restricts interest deduction. So, the failure to introduce a direct interest deduction rule is one of the major defect interest deduction rules in Ethiopia. Besides, the income tax law has failed to limit the special debt-equity ratio that applies to financial institutions. Furthermore, the tax law has failed to set a maximum deductible rate that applies to financial institutions licensed to lend in Ethiopia. To fill these gaps and ensure efficient protection of the tax base against erosion by deduction of interest payment, the researcher called for a direct interest deduction rule. Besides, the researcher called for the introduction of the debt-equity ratio that applies to a financial institution and the maximum deductible interest rate concerning the interest payment to legitimate financial institutions.
机译:使用第三方和相关方的利益是国际税收规划中可用的盈利技术之一。资金的流动性和效力使其成为一个相对简单的练习,以调整受控公司的债务和股权的混合。当债务资金水平大于公司的股本较低的资本时,发生了薄的资本化。如今,薄的资本化是埃塞俄比亚企业税制的主要挑战之一。通过增加债务支付或支付的可扣除利息来降低税收的政府收入。为了解决这个问题,埃塞俄比亚已实施限制利息支付扣除性的税收规则。本文旨在通过对现有文献和法律的定性分析来定性地审查埃塞俄比亚所得税制度下的利息扣除规则。为此,分析开始展开利息扣除的概念框架及其规则,然后审查埃塞俄比亚的利息扣除规则。正如该发现所揭示的那样,新颁布的联邦收入法通过通过债务与股权比例和ARM的长度方法来确定利息扣除利息的最高债务,这是一项巨大的一步。在此过程中,埃塞俄比亚所得税规则纳入了间接利息扣除规则,间接限制了扣除扣除的金额。除此之外,对非居民的利息征收的扣缴税和最大免赔额利息的限制率被通过作为补充ARM的长度和债务对股权的利息扣除方法以保护税基侵蚀。尽管存在这些积极发展,但埃塞俄比亚税法未能认识到直接限制允许扣除的最大利息的直接利息扣除规则。如今,兴趣剥离规则被广泛欣赏为直接限制利息扣除的现代和最有效的方法。因此,未能引入直接利益扣除统治是埃塞俄比亚的主要缺陷利息扣除规则之一。此外,所得税法未能限制适用于金融机构的特殊债务股权。此外,税法未能设定最大的可扣除税率,适用于在埃塞俄比亚贷款的许可。研究人员要求填补这些差距并确保通过扣除利息支付抵消侵蚀侵蚀的税基。此外,研究人员要求引入适用于金融机构的债务股权,以及关于合法金融机构的利息支付的最大可抵扣利率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号