首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Effectiveness and use of prophylactic antibiotics in elective and emergency caesarean section at tertiary care hospital
【24h】

Effectiveness and use of prophylactic antibiotics in elective and emergency caesarean section at tertiary care hospital

机译:预防性抗生素在第三级护理医院选修和急诊剖面中的有效性与应用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Post-operative infections in obstetrics and gynecological settings have been higher compared to other specialties. Women undergoing caesarean section have 5 to 20-fold greater risk for infection compared with vaginal delivery. Many studies reported antimicrobial prophylaxis prevent post-operative infections. Hence this study concentrates the evaluation of the prescribing antimicrobial use and to assess the frequency of post-operative morbidity related to infection in subjects undergoing caesarean section. The aim of the study was to analysis the effectiveness, prophylactic antibiotics (amoxicillin versus ceftriaxone) and to evaluate the post-operative (caesarean) infections in patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section (elective and emergency). Methods: This is a prospective observational study which assessed the effectiveness and use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing cesarean section at department of obstetrics and gynecology. The study was conducted over a period of one year. Results: The corresponding mean age of all the study population in amoxicillin group (n=113) was 56.5±28.5 and in ceftriaxone group (n=97) was 48.5±26.5 respectively. The participant who underwent previous cesarean section in amoxicillin group is 65.48% similarly in ceftriaxone group is 47.42%. The patients with fetal distress in ceftriaxone group are 14.77% and in amoxicillin group is 8.92%. Failed induction in amoxicillin group is 9.82% and in ceftriaxone group is 6.81%. The number of days in hospital stay in amoxicillin group is 42.42% and in ceftriaxone group is 45.94%. The post-operative complications in amoxicillin group reported, with Febrile Illness are 40% and wound Infection is 60%. Conclusions: Administration of pre-operative antibiotics significantly reduce post-operative infections. Use of ceftriaxone as a prophylactic antibiotic in patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section (elective and emergency) is more effective than Amoxicillin in preventing post-operative infections.
机译:背景:与其他专业相比,妇产科和妇科环境的后期感染较高。与阴道分娩相比,接受剖宫产的女性有5至20倍的感染风险。许多研究报告了抗微生物预防可防止术后感染。因此,本研究始于评估处方抗菌用途的评估,并评估患有剖腹产受试者感染的术后发病率的频率。该研究的目的是分析有效性,预防性抗生素(阿莫西林与头孢菌素),并评估患者下段剖宫产(选修和急诊)的术后(剖腹产)感染。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,评估了预防性抗生素在妇产科剖宫产患者中的有效性和使用。该研究在一年内进行。结果:阿莫西林基团(N = 113)中所有研究群的相应平均年龄为56.5±28.5,在头孢曲松组(n = 97)分别为48.5±26.5。在Ceftriaxone组中,在阿莫西林组前剖宫产的参与者在Ceftriaxone组中同样为65.48%,为47.42%。头孢曲松集团胎儿窘迫患者为14.77%,在阿莫西林组中为8.92%。阿莫西林组的诱导失败为9.82%,在头孢菌组中为6.81%。在阿莫西林集团住院时间的天数为42.42%,头孢菌组是45.94%。报告的阿莫西林集团的术后并发症报告,发热疾病40%,伤口感染为60%。结论:给予术前抗生素的给药显着降低术后感染。在接受较低的段剖面(选修和急诊)的患者中,使用头孢曲松作为预防性抗生素比Amoxicillin预防手术后感染更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号