...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Influence Of Socioeconomic Deprivation On Short- And Long-Term Outcomes Of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
【24h】

Influence Of Socioeconomic Deprivation On Short- And Long-Term Outcomes Of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

机译:社会经济剥夺社会经济剥夺对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的家庭肺康复短期和长期结果的影响

获取原文

摘要

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), regardless of disease severity. Socioeconomic deprivation has been linked to the incidence of COPD; however, little is known about its impact on PR outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 459 COPD patients were enrolled and dichotomized into socially deprived (n=276) and non-socially deprived (n=183) groups based on a cut-off of 30.17 in the EPICES questionnaire (Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Centers), which evaluates socioeconomic disadvantage. The PR program consisted of once-weekly home sessions for 8 weeks, and consisted of an individualized plan of retraining exercises, physical activities, therapeutic education, and psychosocial and motivational support. Exercise tolerance, anxiety and depression, and quality of life were assessed using the 6?min stepper test (6MST), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire (VSRQ). Assessments were made before the PR program (baseline) and then at 2 (T2), 8 (T8), and 14 (T14) months after baseline. Results: Compared with the non-socially deprived group, socially deprived patients were younger, more frequently women, active smokers, and living alone, and belonged to lower socioprofessional categories. At baseline, 6MST, VSRQ, and HADS measures were lower for the socially deprived than the non-socially deprived group. At T2, T8, and T14, there were no significant between-group differences in any outcome, and the percentage of patients showing clinically important improvements was the same in both groups. Conclusion: Home-based PR is effective for COPD patients in the short and long term, regardless of socioeconomic status.
机译:背景:无论疾病严重程度如何,肺康复(PR)都会提高慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的运动耐受性和生活质量。社会经济剥夺与COPD的发病率有关;然而,对其对公关结果的影响很少。方法:在此回顾性观察研究中,459名COPD患者注册并分解为社会剥夺(n = 276)和非社会剥夺的(n = 183)组,基于截肢问卷(剥夺评估)的截止值为30.17卫生中心的不平等),评估社会经济劣势。 PR计划由每周一次的家庭课程组成8周,并由一个个性化的培训计划,体育活动,治疗教育和心理社会和励志支持组成。使用6?最小步进试验(6MST),医院焦虑和抑郁尺度(HADS)和视觉简化呼吸问卷(VSRQ)评估运动耐受性,焦虑和抑郁和生活质量。在PR程序(基线)之前进行评估,然后在基线后的2(T2),8(T8)和14个月(T14)。结果:与非社会贫困的小组相比,社会贫困的患者更年轻,更频繁的女性,活跃的吸烟者,独自生活,并且属于较低的社会专业类别。在基线,6MST,VSRQ,并且对于社会剥夺而不是非社会贫困的群体的社会剥夺,措施较低。在T2,T8和T14处,在任何结果中没有显着的差异,并且在两组中显示临床重要改善的患者的百分比是相同的。结论:无论社会经济地位如何,家庭PR对COPD患者有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号