首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Forest Engineering >Mechanized Energy Wood Harvesting from Early Thinnings
【24h】

Mechanized Energy Wood Harvesting from Early Thinnings

机译:从早期薄薄的机械化能源木材收获

获取原文
           

摘要

The felling and bunching of small diameter trees in Finland is still largely carried out manually using a chain saw and clearing saw. The felling of small diameter trees has been developed and mechanized. In addition to the high felling costs of small trees, the move towards mechanized harvesting is also caused by a shortage of professional lumberjacks, the possibility of all-year-round mechanized energy wood harvesting, and an increasing demand for energy wood. The research investigated the productivity, costs and silvicultural result of the guillotine blade equipped, multi-tree-processing Naarva-Grip 1600-40, for small diameter energy wood harvesting. Work-studies were carried out in six young stands at the first thinning stage. In mechanized energy wood harvesting with the Naarva-Grip 1600-40, an average of 73% of the trees felled were multi-tree-processed. The multi-tree-processed proportion increased to 96% in dense Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) sites with small trees. One bunch consisted of approximately 3.2 trees. The average density and volume of removal had the greatest effect on the productivity of the felling-bunching work. Felling-bunching was carried out on the sites at a rate of 106-422 trees per effective hour (E0, excluding delay times). Productivity on the different sites varied from 3.0 to 7.2 m3/E0, giving an average of 4.7 m3/E0 (weighted by felling volume) with an average tree size on the site of 32 dm3. When the size of the felled trees was under 20 dm3, the felling-bunching costs were over 20 US$/m3. When the average tree size on the site increased to 50-70 dm3, the felling-bunching costs approached the 10 US$/m3 level. During the research, the Naarva-Grip 1600-40 proved to be competitive compared to the other multi-tree-processing, energy wood felling heads on the market. In order to keep the felling-bunching costs at a reasonable level, mechanized harvesting should be targeted at sites where the average size of the trees removed is over 30 dm3, and the energy wood volume at felling over 30 m3/ha.
机译:在芬兰的小直径树的砍伐和束缚仍然主要使用链条锯和清理锯手动进行。开发和机械化了小直径树的砍伐。除了小树木的高率,朝机械化收获的举动也是由于专业伐木工短缺引起的,全年圆形机械化能源木材采伐的可能性以及对能源木材的不断增加的需求。该研究调查了配备的断头台刀片的生产率,成本和造林结果,用于小直径能源木材收获。工作研究是在六个年轻人处进行的第一个变薄阶段。在用Naarva-grip 1600-40的机械化能源木材收获中,平均砍伐的73%的树木是多棵树处理的。多树处理的比例增加到浓度苏格兰松树(Pinus Sylvestris L.)站点的96%,具有小树。一堆由大约3.2棵树组成。平均密度和移除量对砍伐作业的生产率产生了最大的影响。砍伐束缚在场景上以每小时106-422棵树(E0,不包括延迟时间)的速度进行。不同部位的生产率从3.0到7.2 m3 / E0变化,平均为4.7m3 / E0(通过砍伐体积加权),平均树尺在32 dm3的场地上。当砍伐树木的大小未满20 dm3时,砍伐成本超过20美元/ m3。当网站上的平均树尺寸增加到50-70dm3时,砍伐成本的成本接近了10美元的$ / m3水平。在研究期间,与市场上的其他多树处理相比,Naarva-grip 1600-40被证明是竞争力的市场。为了以合理的水平保持砍伐的成本,机械化收获应该在被移除的树木的平均大小超过30dm3的地点进行靶向,并且能量木材体积超过30m 3 / ha。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号