首页> 外文期刊>International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences >APPLICATION OF TREE DETECTION METHODS OVER LIDAR DATA FOR FOREST VOLUME ESTIMATION
【24h】

APPLICATION OF TREE DETECTION METHODS OVER LIDAR DATA FOR FOREST VOLUME ESTIMATION

机译:树检测方法在森林体积估计中的激光雷达数据中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Lidar (light detection and ranging) data are becoming more and more important in the analysis of the most relevant forest parameters. This study aims to compare the most recent segmentation methods for single trees using the ALS (Airborne Laser Scanning) point cloud and the CHM (Canopy Height Model). The methods used were the Li et al., method developed in 2012 and the Multi CHM method developed in 2015. The parameters analysed were the height and diameter for the individual trees and the volume and density for the entire forest. The efficiency of each method was verified by comparing the estimated parameters with those measured through 30 test areas. To better identify the useful parameters for the correct calibration of the algorithms, the population was divided into three layers according to the vertical structure and chronological class. From the comparison of the volumes obtained with the above methods and those calculated for the test areas, it emerges a tendency to over-segment for the Multi CHM method, while for the appropriately calibrated Li method there is a better correspondence to reality. The F-score values for the volumes obtained for the Li method are between 0.52 and 0.69 while for those obtained for the Multi CHM method are between 0.47 and 0.55. When compared with relascopic measures for each of the 48 parcels, a mean absolute difference ∼127 m3/ha and ∼141 m3/ha were found for Li2012 and MultiCHM respectively.
机译:LIDAR(光检测和测距)数据在分析最相关的森林参数时变得越来越重要。本研究旨在使用ALS(空气激光扫描)点云和CHM(冠层高度模型)来比较单棵树的最新分割方法。使用的方法是Li等人,2012年开发的方法和2015年开发的多CHM方法。分析的参数是各种树木的高度和直径以及整个森林的体积和密度。通过将估计的参数与通过30个测试区域测量的人进行比较来验证每种方法的效率。为了更好地识别算法的正确校准的有用参数,根据垂直结构和时间量级群体将群体分成三层。根据用上述方法获得的体积的比较和用于测试区域计算的那些,它出现了多CHM方法的过度段的趋势,而对于适当校准的LI方法,可以更好地对应于现实。对于Li方法获得的体积的F刻度值在0.52和0.69之间,而对于多CHM方法获得的那些,在0.47和0.55之间。与48个包裹中的每一个的互联措施相比,分别针对Li2012和Multichm发现平均绝对差异〜127m3 / ha和〜141m 3 / ha。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号