首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Medicine Research >Comparing the effects of manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparing the effects of manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled trial

机译:比较手工针灸,电针和经皮态电神经刺激对慢性耳鸣的影响:随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The aim of this study was to investigate the superiority of the effects of manual acupuncture (MA), electroacupuncture (EA), or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on chronic consecutive tinnitus. Methods Forty-five patients with chronic consecutive tinnitus were allocated into an MA, an EA, or a TENS group at a 1:1:1 ratio. The corresponding patients were treated with MA, EA, or TENS twice a week for 10 sessions (5 weeks). The primary outcome was a change in the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), and the secondary outcomes were loudness and annoyance of tinnitus, pure-tone audiometry (PTA), and the speech discrimination test. The outcome measures were obtained at baseline, visit 5 (week 3), visit 10 (week 5), and visit 11 (follow-up 4 weeks). Results Of the 45 participants, 37 (82.22%) completed the study. There was no difference in the THI score change among the groups at any point. However, the number of participants who had reduced scores of more than 10 points was higher in the EA group than in the TENS or MA groups ( p =?0.037, Fisher's exact test). There was no significant difference in the loudness and annoyance of tinnitus, PTA, and speech discrimination test findings among the groups. Conclusion Among the MA, EA, and TENS groups, there was no significant difference in the effects on the treatment of chronic consecutive tinnitus. However, EA could respond to more patients. Trial registration Registered on October 21, 2016 (KCT0002117 by CRIS).
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是探讨手动针灸(MA),电针(EA)或经皮电子神经刺激(TERS)对慢性连续耳鸣的影响的优越性。方法将45例慢性连续耳鸣的患者分配到1:1:1的比例下分配给MA,EA或数度组。将相应的患者每周两次用MA,EA或Tens治疗10次(5周)。主要结果是耳鸣障碍库存(THI)的变化,二次结果是耳鸣,纯净听力学(PTA)的响度和烦恼,以及语音歧视测试。结果措施是在基线获得的,访问5(第3周),访问10(第5周),并访问11(后续4周)。 45名参与者的结果,37名(82.22%)完成了该研究。在任何时候,群体之间的分数变化没有差异。然而,在EA组中比数十或MA组更高超过10分的参与者的数量(P = 0.037,Fisher的确切测试)。耳鸣,PTA和群体中的歌曲中的响度和烦恼没有显着差异。结论MA,EA和TENS组中,对慢性连续耳鸣的影响没有显着差异。然而,EA可以对更多的患者进行响应。 2016年10月21日注册的试用注册(KCT0002117通过CRIS)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号