首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Validation of Deep Convolutional Neural Network-based algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy – Artificial intelligence versus clinician for screening
【24h】

Validation of Deep Convolutional Neural Network-based algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy – Artificial intelligence versus clinician for screening

机译:基于深度卷积神经网络的检测验证检测糖尿病视网膜病变 - 人工智能与临床医生筛选

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Deep learning is a newer and advanced subfield in artificial intelligence (AI). The aim of our study is to validate a machine-based algorithm developed based on deep convolutional neural networks as a tool for screening to detect referable diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: An AI algorithm to detect DR was validated at our hospital using an internal dataset consisting of 1,533 macula-centered fundus images collected retrospectively and an external validation set using Methods to Evaluate Segmentation and Indexing Techniques in the field of Retinal Ophthalmology (MESSIDOR) dataset. Images were graded by two retina specialists as any DR, prompt referral (moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or above or presence of macular edema) and sight-threatening DR/STDR (severe NPDR or above) and compared with AI results. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) for both internal and external validation sets for any DR detection, prompt referral, and STDR were calculated. Interobserver agreement using kappa value was calculated for both the sets and two out of three agreements for DR grading was considered as ground truth to compare with AI results. Results: In the internal validation set, the overall sensitivity and specificity was 99.7% and 98.5% for Any DR detection and 98.9% and 94.84%for Prompt referral respectively. The AUC was 0.991 and 0.969 for any DR detection and prompt referral respectively. The agreement between two observers was 99.5% and 99.2% for any DR detection and prompt referral with a kappa value of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively. In the external validation set (MESSIDOR 1), the overall sensitivity and specificity was 90.4% and 91.0% for any DR detection and 94.7% and 97.4% for prompt referral, respectively. The AUC was. 907 and. 960 for any DR detection and prompt referral, respectively. The agreement between two observers was 98.5% and 97.8% for any DR detection and prompt referral with a kappa value of 0.971 and 0.980, respectively. Conclusion: With increasing diabetic population and growing demand supply gap in trained resources, AI is the future for early identification of DR and reducing blindness. This can revolutionize telescreening in ophthalmology, especially where people do not have access to specialized health care.
机译:目的:深度学习是人工智能(AI)中的较新和先进的子场。我们的研究目的是验证基于深度卷积神经网络开发的基于机器的算法,作为筛选可转让糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的工具。方法:使用由回顾性收集的1,533个Macula-居中的基底图像组成的内部数据集和使用方法,使用方法进行验证,以使用方法来验证DR的AI算法,以及使用方法来评估视网膜眼科(Messidor)数据集的分割和索引技术。图像被两位视网膜专家评分为任何DR,提示推荐(适度的抗性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)或Prosmulatema的上述或存在)和威胁威胁的DR / STDR(严重NPDR或以上),并与AI结果进行比较。计算任何DR检测,提示推荐和STDR的内部和外部验证集的曲线(AUC)下的灵敏度,特异性和面积。使用Kappa值的Interobserver协议对于博士分级的三种协议计算,其中三种协议被认为是与AI结果相比的原始真理。结果:在内部验证集中,所有DR检测的总敏感性和特异性为99.7%和98.5%,分别为98.9%和94.84%。对于任何DR检测和提示转诊,AUC分别为0.991和0.969。两个观察者之间的协议分别为任何DR检测和99.2%的99.2%,分别提示κ价值0.94和0.96的kappa值。在外部验证集(Messidor 1)中,任何DR检测的总敏感性和特异性分别为94.7%和97.4%,分别为94.7%和97.4%。 AUC是。 907和。 960分别用于任何DR检测和提示转介。两个观察者之间的协议分别为任何DR检测和97.8%的98.5%和97.8%,分别与kappa值分别为0.971和0.980的推荐。结论:随着培训的资源中增加糖尿病人口和日益增长的需求供应差距,AI是早期识别博士的未来和减少盲目的未来。这可以在眼科中彻底改变Telescreening,特别是人们无法获得专门的医疗保健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号