首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >The clinician crowdsourcing challenge: using participatory design to seed implementation strategies
【24h】

The clinician crowdsourcing challenge: using participatory design to seed implementation strategies

机译:临床医生众包挑战:利用参与式设计进行种子实施策略

获取原文
       

摘要

In healthcare settings, system and organization leaders often control the selection and design of implementation strategies even though frontline workers may have the most intimate understanding of the care delivery process, and factors that optimize and constrain evidence-based practice implementation within the local system. Innovation tournaments, a structured participatory design strategy to crowdsource ideas, are a promising approach to participatory design that may increase the effectiveness of implementation strategies by involving end users (i.e., clinicians). We utilized a system-wide innovation tournament to garner ideas from clinicians about how to enhance the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) within a large public behavioral health system. Our innovation tournament occurred in three phases. First, we invited over 500 clinicians to share, through a web-based platform, their ideas regarding how their organizations could best support use of EBPs. Clinicians could rate and comment on ideas submitted by others. Second, submissions were judged by an expert panel (including behavioral scientists, system leaders, and payers) based on their rated enthusiasm for the idea. Third, we held a community-facing event during which the six clinicians who submitted winning ideas presented their strategies to 85 attendees representing a cross-section of clinicians and system and organizational leaders. We had a high rate of participation (12.3%), more than double the average rate of previous tournaments conducted in other settings (5%). A total of 65 ideas were submitted by 55 participants representing 38 organizations. The most common categories of ideas pertained to training (42%), financing and compensation (26%), clinician support and preparation tools (22%), and EBP-focused supervision (17%). The expert panel and clinicians differed on their ratings of the ideas, highlighting value of seeking input from multiple stakeholder groups when developing implementation strategies. Innovation tournaments are a useful and feasible methodology for engaging end users, system leaders, and behavioral scientists through a structured approach to developing implementation strategies. The process and resultant strategies engendered significant enthusiasm and engagement from participants at all levels of a healthcare system. Research is needed to compare the effectiveness of strategies developed through innovation tournaments to strategies developed through design approaches.
机译:在医疗保健环境中,系统和组织领导者通常控制实施策略的选择和设计,即使前线工人可能具有最贴心的护理流程,以及优化和限制当地系统内的证据实践实施的因素。创新锦标赛,对人群思想的结构化参与式设计策略,是参与式设计的有希望的方法,可以通过涉及最终用户(即临床医生)来提高实施策略的有效性。我们利用系统范围内的创新锦标赛来从临床医生获得思想,了解如何在大型公共行性卫生系统中加强基于证据的实践(EBPS)。我们的创新锦标赛发生在三个阶段。首先,我们邀请500多名临床医生通过基于网络的平台分享他们的主意,他们的组织如何最好地支持EBPS。临床医生可以评价和评论其他人提交的想法。其次,根据其对该想法的评价热情,由专家小组(包括行为科学家,系统领导人和付款人)判断提交。第三,我们举办了一个面向社区的活动,期间,提交胜利思想的六名临床医生向85名与会者提出了代表临床医生和制度和组织领导者的85名参加者的策略。我们的参与率很高(12.3%),比在其他环境中进行的先前锦标赛的平均速度增加了两倍(5%)。参加38个组织的55名参与者共提交了65个想法。最常见的思想类别与培训(42%),融资和补偿(26%),临床医生支持和准备工具(22%),以EBP为重点的监督(17%)。专家小组和临床医生对他们的思想评级不同,突出了在制定实施策略时从多个利益相关者群中寻求意见的价值。创新锦标赛是通过制定实施策略的结构化方法来吸引最终用户,系统领导和行为科学家的有用和可行的方法。该过程和结果策略从各级医疗保健系统中提出了显着的热情和参与。需要研究来比较通过创新锦标赛制定的策略的有效性,以通过设计方法制定的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号