首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >How do researchers conceptualize and plan for the sustainability of their NIH R01 implementation projects?
【24h】

How do researchers conceptualize and plan for the sustainability of their NIH R01 implementation projects?

机译:研究人员如何概念化和计划其NIH R01实施项目的可持续性?

获取原文
       

摘要

Inadequate sustainability of implementation of evidence-based interventions has led to calls for research on how sustainability can be optimized. To advance our understanding of intervention sustainability, we explored how implementation researchers conceptualized and planned for the sustainability of their implemented interventions with studies funded by the United States (US) National Institutes of Health (NIH). We used sequential, mixed methods to explore how researchers conceptualized and planned for the sustainability of the health interventions using (1) a document review of all active and completed US NIH R01 Grants and Equivalents reviewed within the Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (DIRH) Study Section between 2004 and 2016 and (2) a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews with NIH R01 DIRH grant recipients. We found 277 R01 profiles within the DIRH study section listed on the US NIH RePORTER website including 84 that were eligible for screening. Of the 84 unique projects, 76 (90.5%) had primary implementation outcomes. Of the 76 implementation project profiles, 51 (67.1%) made references to sustainability and none referred to sustainability planning. In both profiles and interviews, researchers conceptualized sustainability primarily as the continued delivery of interventions, programs, or implementation strategies. Few researchers referenced frameworks with sustainability constructs and offered limited information on how they operationalized frameworks. Researchers described broad categories of approaches and strategies to promote sustainability and key factors that may influence researchers to plan for sustainability, such as personal beliefs, self-efficacy, perception of their role, and the challenges of the grant funding system. We explored how US NIH R01 DIRH grant recipients conceptualized and planned for the sustainability of their interventions. Our results identified the need to test, consolidate, and provide guidance on how to operationalize sustainability frameworks, and to develop strategies on how funders and researchers can advance sustainability research.
机译:实施基于证据的干预措施的可持续性不足导致呼吁研究可持续性如何优化。为了推进我们对干预可持续性的理解,我们探讨了实施研究人员如何概念化和计划在美国(美国)国家卫生学院(NIH)资助的研究中实施其实施干预措施的可持续性。我们使用顺序,混合方法来探索研究人员如何概念化和计划用于使用(1)对所有主动和完成的美国NIH R01拨款和等同于卫生(迪士)的传播和实施研究审查的文件审查2004年至2016年期间的研究部分和(2)与NIH R01 Dirh Grant接受者进行半结构化访谈的定性内容分析。我们在美国NIH记者网站上列出的迪革学习部分中找到了277个R01型材,包括84个有资格进行筛选。在84个独特的项目中,76名(90.5%)有主要实施结果。在76个实施项目型材中,51(67.1%)提到可持续性,也不提到可持续性规划。在概况和访谈中,研究人员主要概念化可持续性,作为持续交付干预措施,方案或执行战略。很少有研究人员引用了可持续性构造的框架,并提供有关运营框架的有限信息。研究人员描述了广泛类别的方法和战略,促进了可能影响研究人员对可持续性计划的可持续性和关键因素,例如个人信仰,自我效能,对其作用的看法以及赠款资金制度的挑战。我们探讨了US NIH R01 Dirh授予接受者的概念化和计划的干预措施的可持续性。我们的业绩确定了需要测试,巩固和提供如何运作可持续性框架的指导,并制定关于资助者和研究人员如何推进可持续性研究的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号