首页> 外文期刊>Annals of King Edward Medical University. >Outcomes of Intermaxillary Fixation Screws Versus Eyelet (Ivy Loop) Wiring Technique for Maxillomandibular Fixation in Fractures of Mandible
【24h】

Outcomes of Intermaxillary Fixation Screws Versus Eyelet (Ivy Loop) Wiring Technique for Maxillomandibular Fixation in Fractures of Mandible

机译:颌骨周围固定术中的颌骨固定螺钉的结果与颌骨裂缝中的颌骨组固定

获取原文
           

摘要

Various techniques have been employed to achieve Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). Although eyelet wiring and arch bars provide an efficient and flexible method of MMF, but there are some drawbacks. However the introduction of newer Intermaxillary fixation screws (IMFS) has advantage over eyelet wiring and arch bars. Objective: To compare the outcome of Intermaxillary fixation screws versus eyelet (ivy loop) wiring technique for Maxillomandibular fixation in fractures of mandible in term of mean time and mean pain. Methods: A Randomized control trial involving 96 patients (age 18-40 years) with mandibular fractures requiring MMF was conducted from 8th July 2017 to 8th December 2017( 6 month period) at Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, King Edward Medical University affiliated Mayo Hospital, Lahore. The sampling technique was non probability consecutive. Patients with minimally displaced mandible fracture were included. The patients were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group-A received IMFS and group-B received eyelet fixation. Mean Time for fixation and mean pain score was measured. Results: The mean fixation time in IMFS group and Eyelet Fixation group was 11.46±2.95 min and 15.67±4.08 min respectively. The mean fixation time in IMFS group was significantly lower when compared to Eyelet fixation group.
机译:已经采用了各种技术来实现上颌组织固定(MMF)。虽然孔眼布线和拱形条提供了一种高效且灵活的MMF方法,但有一些缺点。然而,较新的跨颌骨固定螺钉(IMF)的引入具有优于孔眼布线和拱杆。目的:比较明显(常春藤循环)与孔眼(常春藤环)接线技术的颌骨骨折术语骨折的骨折,平均疼痛。方法:涉及需要MMF的下颌骨折的随机对照试验,涉及需要MMF的下颌骨折至2017年7月8日至2017年12月8日(6个月期间),在爱德华医科大学国王梅奥医院口头和颌面外科部门,拉合尔。采样技术连续是非概率。包括最小流离失所颌骨骨折的患者。将患者随机分成2组。 GROUP-A接收的IMF和GROUP-B接收孔眼固定。测量固定的平均时间和平均疼痛评分。结果:IMFS组和孔眼固定组的平均固定时间分别为11.46±2.95分钟和15.67±4.08分钟。与孔眼固定组相比,IMFS组中的平均固定时间显着降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号