...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of mining sciences >Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR)
【24h】

Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR)

机译:基因表达编程(GEP),人工神经网络(ANNS)和线性多变量回归(LMR)预测爆炸诱导的地面振动。

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper, an attempt was made to find out two empirical relationships incorporating linear mul-tivariate regression (LMR) and gene expression programming (GEP) for predicting the blast-inducedground vibration (BIGV) at the Sarcheshmeh copper mine in south of Iran. For this purpose, five types ofeffective parameters in the blasting operation including the distance from the blasting block, the burden,the spacing, the specific charge, and the charge per delay were considered as the input data while theoutput parameter was the BIGV. The correlation coefficient and root mean squared error for the LMRwere 0.70 and 3.18 respectively, while the values for the GEP were 0.91 and 2.67 respectively. Also, forevaluating the validation of these two methods, a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) witha 5-20-1 structure has been used for predicting the BIGV. Comparisons of these parameters revealed thatboth methods successfully suggested two empirical relationships for predicting the BIGV in the casestudy. However, the GEP was found to be more reliable and more reasonable.
机译:在本文中,试图了解包含线性Mul-Tivariatiate(LMR)和基因表达编程(GEP)的两种实证关系,用于预测伊朗南部的阶级铜矿的爆炸诱导振动(BIGV)。为此目的,在爆破块的爆破操作中的五种类型的参数,包括距爆破块的距离,负担,间隔,特定电荷和每次延迟的充电被认为是输入数据,而TheOutput参数是BIGV。 LMRWERE 0.70和3.18的相关系数和均方根误差分别为0.718,而GEP的值分别为0.91和2.67。而且,迫切地验证这两种方法,馈通人工神经网络(ANN)与5-20-1结构已经用于预测BIGV。这些参数的比较揭示了禁止方法,提出了两种实证关系,以预测案例中的大型巨头。然而,发现GEP更可靠,更合理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号