...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Screening for early onset neonatal sepsis: NICE guidance-based practice versus projected application of the Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in the UK population
【24h】

Screening for early onset neonatal sepsis: NICE guidance-based practice versus projected application of the Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in the UK population

机译:早期发病新生儿脓毒症的筛查:基于指导的良好的实践与英国人口的Kaiser Permanente Sepsis风险计算器的预计应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To compare management recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines with the Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator (SRC) for risk of early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). Design Multicentre prospective observational projection study. Setting Eight maternity hospitals in Wales, UK. Patients All live births ≥34 weeks gestation over a 3-month period (February–April 2018). Methods Demographics, maternal and infant risk factors, infant’s clinical status, antibiotic usage and blood culture results from first 72?hours of birth were collected. Infants were managed using NICE recommendations and decisions compared with that projected by SRC. Main outcome measure Proportion of infants recommended for antibiotics on either tool. Results Of 4992 eligible infants, complete data were available for 3593 (71.9%). Of these, 576 (16%) were started on antibiotics as per NICE recommendations compared with 156 (4.3%) projected by the SRC, a relative reduction of 74%. Of the 426 infants avoiding antibiotics, SRC assigned 314 (54.6%) to normal care only. There were seven positive blood cultures—three infants were recommended antibiotics by both, three were not identified in the asymptomatic stage by either; one was a contaminant. No EONS-related readmission was reported. Conclusion The judicious adoption of SRC in UK clinical practice for screening and management of EONS could potentially reduce interventions and antibiotic usage in three out of four term or near-term infants and promote earlier discharge from hospital in 50%. We did not identify any EONS case missed by SRC when compared with NICE. These results have significant implications for healthcare resources.
机译:目的,比较国家健康和护理研究所的管理建议(尼斯)与Kaiser Permanente败血症风险计算器(SRC)进行早期发病新生儿败血症(EONS)的风险。设计多中心前瞻性观察投影研究。在英国威尔士设定八家产妇医院。患者全生产≥34周的妊娠期3个月(2018年2月至4月)。方法收集人口统计数据,婴儿临床状况,婴儿的临床状态,抗生素使用量和血液培养结果。与SRC预测的,使用不错的建议和决定管理婴儿。主要结果测量婴儿在任何一种工具上推荐抗生素的比例。结果4992符合条件的婴儿,可提供完整数据3593(71.9%)。其中,与SRC预测的156(4.3%)相比,576(16%)在抗生素上开始,相当减少74%。在避免抗生素的426名婴儿中,SRC仅分配314(54.6%)到正常保健。有七种阳性血液培养 - 三个婴儿推荐抗生素两者,三个未经无症状的阶段鉴定;一个是污染物。没有报告任何与EONS相关的入院。结论SRC在英国临床实践中的临床实践筛选和管理中的临床实践可能会在四个期限或近期婴儿中的三个中可能降低干预和抗生素使用,并促进较早的医院排放> 50%。与尼斯相比,我们没有确定SRC错过的任何EONS案例。这些结果对医疗资源有重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号