首页> 外文期刊>Archives of public health >Epidemiology of neonatal infections in hospitals of Nepal: evidence from a large- scale study
【24h】

Epidemiology of neonatal infections in hospitals of Nepal: evidence from a large- scale study

机译:尼泊尔医院新生儿感染的流行病学:来自大规模研究的证据

获取原文
       

摘要

Background:Every year, neonatal infections account for approximately 750,000 neonatal deaths globally. It is the third major cause of neonatal death, globally and in Nepal. There is a paucity of data on clinical aetiology and outcomes of neonatal infection in Nepal. This paper aims to assess the incidence and risk factors of neonatal infection in babies born in public hospitals of Nepal.Methods:This is a prospective cohort study conducted for a period of 14?months, nested within a large-scale cluster randomized control trial which evaluated the Helping Babies Breathe Quality Improvement package in 12 public hospitals in Nepal. All the mothers who consented to participate within the study and delivered in these hospitals were included in the analysis. All neonates admitted into the sick newborn care unit weighing ?1500?g or/and 32?weeks or more gestation with clinical signs of infection or positive septic screening were taken as cases and those that did not have an infection were the comparison group. Bivariate and multi-variate analysis of socio-demographic, maternal, obstetric and neonatal characteristics of case and comparison group were conducted to assess risk factors associated with neonatal infection.Results:The overall incidence of neonatal infection was 7.3 per 1000 live births. Babies who were born to first time mothers were at 64% higher risk of having infection (aOR-1.64, 95% CI, 1.30-2.06, p-value?0.001). Babies born to mothers who had no antenatal check-up had more than three-fold risk of infection (aOR-3.45, 95% CI, 1.82-6.56, p-value?0.001). Babies born through caesarean section had more than two-fold risk (aOR-2.06, 95% CI, 1.48-2.87, p-value?0.001) and babies with birth asphyxia had more than three-fold risk for infection (aOR-3.51, 95% CI, 1.71-7.20, p-value?=?0.001).Conclusion:Antepartum factors, such as antenatal care attendance, and intrapartum factors such as mode of delivery and birth asphyxia, were risk factors for neonatal infections. These findings highlight the importance of ANC visits and the need for proper care during resuscitation in babies with birth asphyxia.? The Author(s) 2020.
机译:背景:每年,新生儿感染占全球约750,000名新生儿死亡。这是新生儿死亡,全球和尼泊尔的第三个主要原因。尼泊尔新生儿感染的临床缓解学和结果存在数据。本文旨在评估出生于尼泊尔公立医院的新生儿感染的发病率和风险因素。方法:这是一个预期的队列研究,为期14个月,嵌套在大规模的集群随机控制试验中评估尼泊尔12名公立医院的帮助婴儿呼吸质量改善包。同意在研究中参与并在这些医院交付的所有母亲都包含在分析中。所有新生儿进入病人新生儿护理单位称重>?1500?g或/和32个?周或更多的妊娠与感染或阳性化粪池筛查的临床症状和没有感染的人是对比组。对社会人口统计学,母体,产科和新生儿特征进行双变量和多变异分析,以评估与新生儿感染相关的风险因素。结果:新生儿感染的总发病率为每1000个活产。出生于第一次母亲的婴儿患有感染的风险较高64%(AOR-1.64,95%CI,1.30-2.06,P值<0.001)。对没有产前检查的母亲的婴儿有超过三倍的感染风险(AOR-3.45,95%CI,1.82-6.56,P值<0.001)。通过剖腹产出生的婴儿有超过两倍的风险(AOR-2.06,95%CI,1.48-2.87,P值<0.001)和出生窒息的婴儿具有超过三倍的感染风险(AOR-3.51 ,95%CI,1.71-7.20,P值?=?0.001)。结论:诸如产前护理出席和产前的产前因子和产卵和厌恶模式,窒息的内部因素是新生儿感染的危险因素。这些发现突出了ANC访问的重要性,以及在患有厌恶的婴儿复苏期间对婴儿复苏的需要。作者2020年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号