首页> 外文期刊>Acute and critical care. >Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
【24h】

Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study

机译:Lund和Browder图表改性与原件:比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:The Lund and Browder (LB) chart is currently the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury. However, it is not easy to use charts to calculate burn percentages because of the difficulty in performing mathematical calculations with the percentages attributed to various body regions that are only partially burned. It is also cumbersome to have to perform mental calculations, especially in emergency situations.METHODS:We compared results from the LB chart with a modified Lund and Browder (MLB) chart using 10 assessors on five different burn wounds each drawn on both charts.RESULTS:Variability of results was significantly reduced using the MLB chart compared to the LB chart.CONCLUSIONS:Assessments performed using the MLB chart are less variable than those using the LB chart. Using this chart will help burn care providers rapidly, accurately, and reliably estimate burn extent.
机译:背景:LUND和BROWDER(LB)图表目前是最准确和广泛使用的图表,以计算受烧伤受损影响的总体表面积。然而,由于难以执行仅部分烧毁的各种身体区域的百分比,因此不容易计算烧伤百分比计算烧伤百分比。必须在紧急情况下执行精神计算计算也很麻烦。 :与LB图表相比,使用MLB图表显着减少了结果的可变性。结论:使用MLB图表执行的评估比使用LB图表的变量更少。使用此图表将有助于快速,准确,可靠地估计燃烧范围的护理提供者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号