首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Biological Chemistry >Incision Site in Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery in Case of Preoperative Direct Astigmatism
【24h】

Incision Site in Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery in Case of Preoperative Direct Astigmatism

机译:在术前直接散光的情况下,在手动小切口性白内障手术中切割部位

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We compared surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) by a superior incision with a temporal incision in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS), in patients with bilateral direct (regular) preoperative corneal astigmatisms. Patients and method: We carried out a prospective study from July 1st 2018 to September 30th 2019 in the department of ophthalmology at the University Hospital of Brazzaville. Keratometric readings were recorded before surgery to assess preoperative corneal astigmatisms. Keratometric evaluation was done 45 days post-operatively. Patients were followed 90 days after surgery in order to assess the healing of the surgical site. The surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) is the difference in the magnitude vectors between the preoperative and postoperative astigmatism. The result was positive if the postoperative astigmatism was greater than the preoperative astigmatism and negative if the postoperative astigmatism was less than the preoperative astigmatism. Results: Our study sample included 48 eyes from 24 patients, including 24 operated on temporal incision and 24 in superior incision. The average SIA for superior incisions was 0.33 1.55 diopters (D), versus 0.33 1.44 for temporal incisions. For superior incisions the SIA was 0.81 for astigmatisms lower than 2D, against 0.16D for the temporal incisions. On the other hand, for preoperative astigmatisms greater than 2D, the surgically induced astigmatism was 0.62D, marking a decrease in preoperative astigmatism for the superior incisions against an increase of 0.5D for the temporal incisions. The healing was delayed for the temporal incisions responsible for discomfort persisting beyond 45 days. Conclusion: The temporal incision had better results than the superior incision for astigmatisms lower than 2D, and less good for astigmatisms higher than 2D. The temporal incision healed less well.
机译:我们通过在手动小切口白内障手术(MSICS)中的颞切口,在双侧直接(常规)术前角膜散光中,将手术诱导的散光(SIA)进行比较。患者和方法:我们在Brazzaville大学医院的眼科部门2018年7月1日至2019年9月30日进行了一项前瞻性研究。在手术前记录了静脉内读数,以评估术前角膜散发。操作术后45天进行了静脉测量。手术后90天遵循患者,以评估手术部位的愈合。手术诱导的散光(SIA)是术前和术后散散之间的幅度矢量的差异。如果术后散光大于术前散光,并且如果术后散光低于术前散光,则结果是阳性。结果:我们的研究样本包括24名患者的48只眼睛,其中24名在颞切口和24例在卓越的切口操作。卓越切口的平均SIA为0.33 1.55屈光度(D),而颞切口为0.33 1.44。对于优越的切口,SIA为0.81,散光低于2D,针对时间切口0.16D。另一方面,对于术前散光大于2D,手术诱导的散光为0.62d,标记术前分散的术前散光,用于颞切口增加0.5d。愈合因持续超过45天而持久的颞切口延迟。结论:时间切口与低于2D的散光的优越切口具有更好的效果,并且对于高于2D的散光不太好。时间切口愈合不太好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号