...
首页> 外文期刊>Case Reports in Clinical Medicine >Incision Site in Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery in Case of Preoperative Direct Astigmatism
【24h】

Incision Site in Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery in Case of Preoperative Direct Astigmatism

机译:术前直接散光的人工小切口白内障手术切口

获取原文

摘要

We compared surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) by a superior incision with a temporal incision in manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS), in patients with bilateral direct (regular) preoperative corneal astigmatisms. Patients and method: We carried out a prospective study from July 1~(st) 2018 to September 30~(th) 2019 in the department of ophthalmology at the University Hospital of Brazzaville. Keratometric readings were recorded before surgery to assess preoperative corneal astigmatisms. Keratometric evaluation was done 45 days post-operatively. Patients were followed 90 days after surgery in order to assess the healing of the surgical site. The surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) is the difference in the magnitude vectors between the preoperative and postoperative astigmatism. The result was positive if the postoperative astigmatism was greater than the preoperative astigmatism and negative if the postoperative astigmatism was less than the preoperative astigmatism. Results: Our study sample included 48 eyes from 24 patients, including 24 operated on temporal incision and 24 in superior incision. The average SIA for superior incisions was 0.33 ± 1.55 diopters (D), versus 0.33 ± 1.44 for temporal incisions. For superior incisions the SIA was 0.81 for astigmatisms lower than 2D, against 0.16D for the temporal incisions. On the other hand, for preoperative astigmatisms greater than 2D, the surgically induced astigmatism was ± 0.62D, marking a decrease in preoperative astigmatism for the superior incisions against an increase of 0.5D for the temporal incisions. The healing was delayed for the temporal incisions responsible for discomfort persisting beyond 45 days. Conclusion: The temporal incision had better results than the superior incision for astigmatisms lower than 2D, and less good for astigmatisms higher than 2D. The temporal incision healed less well.
机译:我们在双侧直接(常规)术前角膜散光患者中,将手工切口小切口白内障手术(MSICS)的临时切口与手术切口的手术诱发散光(SIA)进行了比较。患者和方法:我们于2018年7月1日至2019年9月30日在布拉柴维尔大学医院眼科进行了一项前瞻性研究。术前记录角膜曲率读数,以评估术前角膜散光。术后45天进行角膜测量评估。在手术后90天对患者进行随访,以评估手术部位的愈合情况。手术引起的散光(SIA)是术前和术后散光的幅度向量之差。如果术后散光大于术前散光,则结果为阳性;如果术后散光小于术前散光,则结果为阴性。结果:我们的研究样本包括来自24例患者的48眼,其中24例行颞切口手术,24例行上切口手术。上切口的平均SIA为0.33±1.55屈光度(D),而颞切口为0.33±1.44。对于上切口,散光度低于2D的SIA为0.81,而颞部切口的SIA为0.16D。另一方面,对于大于2D的术前散光,手术引起的散光为± 0.62D,标志着上切口的术前散光减少,而颞部切口的散光增加了0.5D。由于造成不适的颞切口持续超过45天,愈合延迟。结论:对于低于2D的散光,颞切口比上切口具有更好的效果,而对于高于2D的散光,颞切口效果较差。颞切口愈合不佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号