首页> 外文期刊>Conflict and Health >A systematic literature review of the ethics of conducting research in the humanitarian setting
【24h】

A systematic literature review of the ethics of conducting research in the humanitarian setting

机译:人道主义环境中导演研究伦理学的系统文献综述

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Research around humanitarian crises, aid delivery, and the impact of these crises on health and well-being has expanded dramatically. Ethical issues around these topics have recently received more attention. We conducted a systematic literature review to synthesize the lessons learned regarding the ethics of research in humanitarian crises. We conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify articles regarding the ethics of research in humanitarian contexts between January 1, 1997 and September 1, 2019. We analyzed the articles to extract key themes and develop an agenda for future research. We identified 52 articles that matched our inclusion criteria. We categorized the article data into five categories of analysis: 32 were expert statements, 18 were case studies, 11 contained original research, eight were literature reviews and three were book chapters. All included articles were published in English. Using a step-wise qualitative analysis, we identified 10 major themes that encompassed these concepts and points. These major themes were: ethics review process (21 articles, [40.38%]); community engagement (15 articles [28.85%]); the dual imperative, or necessity that research be both academically sound and policy driven, clinical trials in the humanitarian setting (13 articles for each, [25.0%)]; informed consent (10 articles [19.23%]); cultural considerations (6 articles, [11.54%]); risks to researchers (5 articles, [9.62%]); child participation (4 articles [7.69%]); and finally mental health, and data ownership (2 articles for each [3.85%]). Interest in the ethics of studying humanitarian crises has been dramatically increasing in recent years. While key concepts within all research settings such as beneficence, justice and respect for persons are crucially relevant, there are considerations unique to the humanitarian context. The particular vulnerabilities of conflict-affected populations, the contextual challenges of working in humanitarian settings, and the need for ensuring strong community engagement at all levels make this area of research particularly challenging. Humanitarian crises are prevalent throughout the globe, and studying them with the utmost ethical forethought is critical to maintaining sound research principles and ethical standards.
机译:关于人道主义危机,援助交付的研究以及这些危机对健康和幸福的影响已经大幅扩张。这些主题周围的道德问题最近得到了更多的关注。我们进行了系统的文献综述,综合了关于人道主义危机研究伦理学的经验教训。我们利用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行了系统审查,以确定1997年1月1日至2019年9月1日之间的人道主义情报界的条款。我们分析了提取关键的文章主题并制定未来研究的议程。我们确定了52篇与纳入标准匹配的文章。我们将文章数据分类为五类分析:32是专家陈述,18名是案例研究,11个含有原创研究,八是文学评论,三个是书章节。所有包括的文章都是用英文发表的。使用逐步的定性分析,我们确定了包含这些概念和积分的10个主要主题。这些主要主题是:道德审查过程(21条,[40.38%]);社区参与(15篇文章[28.85%]);研究的双重势在必行或必要性是学者合理和政策驱动的,人道主义环境中的临床试验(每个人为13篇,[25.0%)];知情同意(10条[19.23%]);文化考虑(6条,[11.54%]);研究人员的风险(5篇文章,[9.62%]);儿童参与(4篇文章[7.69%]);最后的心理健康,以及数据所有权(每篇文章[3.85%])。近年来,对学习人道主义危机的伦理的兴趣在显着增加。虽然所有研究环境中的关键概念如惠良,正义和尊重人员都是至关重要的,但有考虑人道主义背景的考虑因素。受冲突影响的人口的特殊脆弱性,在人道主义环境中工作的背景挑战,以及确保在各级的强大社区参与的必要性使得这一研究领域特别具有挑战性。人道主义危机在全球范围内普遍存在,并以最大的道德学习为重要的是,对维持合理的研究原则和道德标准至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号