首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Science A&I Database Holdings at ARL and Oberlin Group Libraries, 2011–2016: A Longitudinal Study
【24h】

Science A&I Database Holdings at ARL and Oberlin Group Libraries, 2011–2016: A Longitudinal Study

机译:科学A&我在ARL和Oberlin Group Libraries的数据库控股,2011-2016:纵向研究

获取原文
       

摘要

After instituting major cuts to discipline-specific science abstracting and indexing (A&I) databases at an ARL library due to significant budget cuts, the author sought to determine if such cuts were being made by other academic libraries and what trends could be found in holdings of such databases. Annually, over the course of eight years, 108 ARL libraries and 74 Oberlin Group library website A–Z database lists were reviewed to look for the presence of 21 Science and Technology A&I databases. Additions and cancellations were recorded and verified. The results indicate little change in the holdings of several discipline-specific databases including MathsciNet, SciFinder Scholar, and GeoRef, while there were declines in holdings of several other databases including INSPEC, Biological Abstracts, and Compendex. Also measured were holdings of Proquest and EBSCO science A&I databases, which saw small declines in holdings, as well as holdings of comprehensive A&I databases Scopus and Web of Science, which saw a significant increase for Scopus holdings.
机译:在为纪律削减到纪律的科学削减之后,由于重大预算削减,在ARL图书馆的纪律特定的科学抽象和索引(A&I)数据库之后,提交人试图确定其他学术图书馆是否正在制定此类削减,以及在持有的趋势中可以找到哪些趋势这样的数据库。每年,在八年的过程中,审查了108个ARL库和74个Oberlin集团库网站A-Z数据库列表,以寻找21个科学和技术的存在A&I数据库。记录和验证添加和取消。结果表明,包括Mathscinet,Scifinder学者和Georef,包括Mathscinet,Scifinder学者和Georef,持有几个数据库的持有量,包括Inspec,Biological摘要和Comendex的持有下降。衡量的是Proquest和EBSCO Science A&I数据库的持股,其在持有人中略有下降,以及持有全面的A&I数据库和科学网络的持股,这对Scopus Holdings显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号