首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Cost Differentials between E-Books and Print in Academic Libraries
【24h】

Cost Differentials between E-Books and Print in Academic Libraries

机译:在学术图书馆中的电子书和印刷之间的成本差异

获取原文
       

摘要

Academic libraries continue to face funding pressures compounded by the need to provide students with access to electronic resources, both in journal and book formats. With space constraints and the need to repurpose library space to other uses, libraries must carefully examine the move to e-only formats for books to determine if the format makes reasonable economic sense.A survey conducted at Auburn University at Montgomery (AUM) has confirmed for academic libraries the work of Gray and Copeland on e-books being more expensive than print for public libraries. For AUM, the mean cost for an e-book is significantly higher than for the print counterpart of that title. The cost differentials between the two formats show e-books as being consistently higher than print in initial price. This consistency holds true across all LC classifications, regardless of whether or not the title is published by a university press or a commercial press.
机译:学术图书馆继续面对资金压力,以便在日记和书籍格式中为学生提供能够获得电子资源的学生。对于空间限制和需要将库空间重新释放到其他用途的需要,库必须仔细检查移动到唯一格式的书籍,以确定该格式是否具有合理的经济意义。在蒙哥马利奥巴恩大学(AUM)进行的调查已确认对于学术图书馆来说,灰色和北部的工作在电子书上比公共图书馆的印刷更昂贵。对于AUM来说,电子书的平均成本明显高于该标题的打印对应物。两种格式之间的成本差异显示电子书,始终高于初始价格的印刷品。无论标题是否由大学出版社或商业出版社出版,此一致性都持有所有LC分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号