...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical diabetes and endocrinology. >How is neighborhood social disorganization associated with diabetes outcomes? A multilevel investigation of glycemic control and self-reported use of acute or emergency health care services
【24h】

How is neighborhood social disorganization associated with diabetes outcomes? A multilevel investigation of glycemic control and self-reported use of acute or emergency health care services

机译:邻里社会混乱如何与糖尿病结果相关?血糖控制的多级调查和自我报告的急性或应急医疗服务

获取原文

摘要

Diabetes management is influenced by a number of factors beyond the individual-level. This study examined how neighborhood social disorganization (i.e., neighborhoods characterized by high economic disadvantage, residential instability, and ethnic heterogeneity), is associated with diabetes-related outcomes. We used a multilevel modeling approach to investigate the associations between census-tract neighborhood social disorganization, A1c, and self-reported use of acute or emergency health care services for a sample of 424 adults with type 2 diabetes. Individuals living in neighborhoods with high social disorganization had higher A1c values than individuals living in neighborhoods with medium social disorganization (B?=?0.39, p?=?0.01). Individuals living in neighborhoods with high economic disadvantage had higher self-reported use of acute or emergency health care services than individuals living in neighborhoods with medium economic disadvantage (B?=?0.60, p?=?0.02). High neighborhood social disorganization was associated with higher A1c values and high neighborhood economic disadvantage was associated with greater self-reported use of acute or emergency health care services. Controlling for individual level variables diminished this effect for A1c, but not acute or emergency health care use. Comprehensive approaches to diabetes management should include attention to neighborhood context. Failure to do so may help explain the continuing disproportionate diabetes burden in many neighborhoods despite decades of attention to individual-level clinical care and education. For this study, we used baseline data from a larger study investigating the impacts on patient-centered outcomes of three different approaches to self-monitoring of blood glucose among 450 adults with non-insulin dependent type 2 diabetes living in North Carolina. This study was registered as a clinical trial on 1/7/2014 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02033499).
机译:糖尿病管理受到超出个人级别的一些因素的影响。本研究审查了邻里社会紊乱的方式(即,以高经济缺点,住宅不稳定和种族异质性为特征的社区,与糖尿病有关的结果有关。我们利用多级建模方法来调查人口普查街道社会混乱,A1C和自我报告的急性或应急医疗服务的协会,为224名糖尿病的424名成人样本。生活在高社会混乱的社区居中的个人具有比居住在中等社会紊乱的社区(B?= 0.39,P?= 0.01)的邻居的居住人的价值观更高。居住在高经济劣势的社区的个人自我报告的使用急性或应急卫生保健服务,而不是居住在中等经济劣势的社区(B?= 0.60,P?= 0.02)。高社会混乱与较高的A1C值相关,高社区经济劣势与更高的自我报告的急性或紧急卫生保健服务有关。控制各个级别变量对A1C的影响减少了这种效果,但不是急性或紧急保健使用。糖尿病管理的综合方法应注意对邻里背景。尽管有数十年的关注个人级别的临床护理和教育,但仍有人可能有助于解释许多社区的持续不成比例的糖尿病负担。对于这项研究,我们使用了一个较大的研究中的基线数据,调查了在450名成年人中对血糖的自我监测血糖中的患者为中心结果的影响。居住在北卡罗来纳州的非胰岛素依赖性2型糖尿病。本研究于2014年1月7日注册为临床试验(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct02033499)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号