首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Mobile Geriatric Teams – A Cost-Effective Way Of Improving Patient Safety And Reducing Traditional Healthcare Utilization Among The Frail Elderly? A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Mobile Geriatric Teams – A Cost-Effective Way Of Improving Patient Safety And Reducing Traditional Healthcare Utilization Among The Frail Elderly? A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:移动老年队 - 改善患者安全性和减少体弱老年人的传统医疗利用的成本效益的方式吗?随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Demographic changes combined with costly technological progress put a financial strain on the healthcare sector in the industrialized world. Hence, there is a constant need to develop new cost-effective treatment procedures in order to optimize the use of available resources. As a response, the concept of a Mobile Geriatric Team (MGT) has emerged not only nationally but also internationally during the last decade; however, scientific evaluation of this initiative has been very scarce. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a mixed methods analysis, including a prospective, controlled and randomized quantitative evaluation, in combination with an interview-based qualitative assessment, to measure the effectiveness and user satisfaction of MGT. Materials and methods: Community-dwelling, frail elderly people were randomized to an intervention group (n=31, mean age 84) and a control group (n=31, mean age 86). A two-year retrospective quantitative data collection and a prospective one-year follow-up on healthcare utilization were combined with qualitative interviews. Non-parametric statistics and difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses were applied to the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: No significant group differences in healthcare utilization were found before inclusion. Post intervention, primary care contact (including MGTs) increased for the MGT group. Inpatient care decreased dramatically for both groups. Hence, the increase in primary care contact for MGT patients was not accompanied by a reduction in inpatient care compared to the control group. Utilization of non-primary care was lower (p 0.01) post-intervention in both groups. Conclusion: There appears to be a “natural” variation in healthcare needs over time among frail elderly people. Hence, it is vital to perform open, controlled clinical studies in tandem with the implementation of new caregiving strategies. The MGT initiative was clearly appreciated but did not fully achieve the desired reduction in healthcare utilization in this study. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered 09/10/2018, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03662945.
机译:背景:人口统计变化与昂贵的技术进步相结合,对工业化世界的医疗保健部门进行了金融压力。因此,持续需要开发新的经济有效的治疗程序,以优化使用可用资源。作为回应,移动老年队(MGT)的概念不仅出现在过去十年中的国家,而且是在国际上的;然而,对这一倡议的科学评估非常稀缺。因此,本研究的目的是进行混合方法分析,包括前瞻性,受访和随机的定量评估,与基于面试的定性评估组合,以衡量MGT的有效性和用户满意度。材料和方法:社区住宅,勒漏老年人被随机化为干预组(n = 31,平均年龄84)和对照组(n = 31,平均年龄86)。两年的回顾性定量数据收集和对医疗利用率的预期一年后续随访与定性访谈相结合。非参数统计和差异差异(DID)分析应用于定量数据。使用内容分析分析定性数据。结果:在包含之前发现了医疗利用的显着群体差异。干预后,MGT组初级护理接触(包括MgT)增加。适用于这两个群体的住院护理急剧下降。因此,与对照组相比,MGT患者的初级保健接触的增加不伴随着病例治疗。非初级护理的利用率较低(P <0.01)两组后干预后。结论:在Frail老年人中,医疗保健需求的似乎是“自然”的变化。因此,通过实施新的护理策略,对串联进行开放,受控临床研究至关重要。明确欣赏MGT倡议,但没有完全达到本研究中医疗利用的预期降低。审判登记:回顾性注册09/10/2018,ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03662945。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号