首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Respiratory Journal >Accuracy of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pneumothorax: A Comparison between Neonates and Adults—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Accuracy of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pneumothorax: A Comparison between Neonates and Adults—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:超声诊断中超声的准确性:新生儿与成人的比较 - 一种系统综述与荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in neonates and adults. Method. The searches were conducted by two independent researchers (MS and HD) to find the relevant studies published from 01/01/2009 until the end of 01/01/2019. We searched for published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase? via ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Trip database. For literature published in other languages, we searched national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS, and we searched OpenGrey (http://www.opengrey.eu/) and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry (http://who.int/ictrp) for unpublished literature and ongoing studies. The keywords used in the search strategy were pneumothorax or ultrasound or chest ultrasonography or neonate or adult or aerothorax or sensitivity or specificity or diagnostic accuracy. The list of previous study resources and systematic reviews was also searched for identifying the published studies (MS and HD). Analyses were performed using Meta-Disc 1.4. Results. In total, 1,565 patients (255 neonates, 1212 adults, and 101 pediatrics suspected of pneumothorax) were investigated in 10 studies. The overall specificity of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in both populations of adults and neonates was 85.1% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 81.1%–88.5%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the sensitivity was 98.6% (95% CI 97.7%–99.2%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 387.72 (95% CI 76.204–1972.7). For the diagnosis of pneumothorax in neonates, the ultrasound sensitivity was 96.7% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 88.3%–99.6%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the specificity was 100% (95% CI 97.7%–100%). For the diagnosis of pneumothorax in adults, the ultrasound sensitivity was 82.9% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 78.3–86.9%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the specificity was 98.2% (95% CI 97.0%–99.0%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 423.13 (95% CI 45.222–3959.1). Analyzing studies indicated that the sensitivity of “absence lung sliding” sign for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 87.2% (95% CI 77.7–93.7), and specificity was 99.4% (95% CI 96.5%–100%). DOR was 556.74 (95% CI 100.03–3098.7). The sensitivity of “lung point” sign for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 82.1% (95% CI 71.7%–89.8%), and the specificity was 100% (at the confidence interval of 95% CI 97.6%–100%). DOR was 298.0 (95% CI 58.893–1507.8). Conclusion. The diagnosis of pneumothorax using ultrasound is accurate and reliable; additionally, it can result in timely diagnoses specifically in neonatal pneumothorax. Using this method facilitates the therapy process; lack of ionizing radiation and easy operation are benefits of this imaging technique.
机译:客观的。进行了本系统的审查和荟萃分析,以研究超声中的精度在新生儿和成人中肺炎的诊断。方法。搜索是由两个独立的研究人员(MS和HD)进行的,以找到从01/01/2009年01/01/2001/01/01/01/01/2019的相关研究。我们在Medline通过PubMed中搜索了英语中的文献中的文献,Embase?通过OVID,Cochrane库和旅行数据库。对于以其他语言发表的文学,我们搜索了国家数据库(Magiran和SID),Koreamed和Lilacs,我们搜索了OpenGrey(http://www.opengrey.eu/)和世界卫生组织临床试验登记处(http:/ /who.int/ctrp)用于未发表的文学和正在进行的研究。搜索策略中使用的关键字是气胸或超声波或胸部超声波或新生儿或成人或静止或敏感性或诊断准确性。还搜索了以前的学习资源和系统评价的清单,用于识别已发表的研究(MS和HD)。使用元盘1.4进行分析。结果。在10项研究中,研究了总共1,565名患者(255名新生儿,1212名成人和101名儿科)。胸部超声在成人和新生儿群体诊断中的整体特异性在95%的置信区间的置信区间为85.1%(95%CI 81.1%-88.5%)。在95%的置信区间,敏感性为98.6%(95%CI 97.7%-99.2%)。诊断赔率比为387.72(95%CI 76.204-1972.7)。为了诊断新生儿中的肺炎,超声敏感性为96.7%,置信区间为95%(95%CI 88.3%-99.6%)。在95%的置信区间,特异性为100%(95%CI 97.7%-100%)。为了诊断成虫中的气胸,超声敏感性为82.9%,置信区间为95%(95%CI 78.3-86.9%)。在95%的置信区间,特异性为98.2%(95%CI 97.0%-99.0%)。诊断赔率比为423.13(95%CI 45.222-3959.1)。分析研究表明,“缺席肺滑动”标志用于诊断肺炎的敏感性为87.2%(95%CI 77.7-93.7),特异性为99.4%(95%CI 96.5%-100%)。 DOR为556.74(95%CI 100.03-3098.7)。 “肺点”标志用于诊断肺炎的敏感性为82.1%(95%CI 71.7%-89.8%),特异性为100%(以95%CI 97.6%-100%的置信区间为95%。 Dor是298.0(95%CI 58.893-1507.8)。结论。使用超声波诊断肺炎的诊断是准确可靠的;此外,它可以在新生儿肺炎中特别诊断。使用该方法有助于治疗过程;缺乏电离辐射和易于操作是这种成像技术的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号