首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Cetuximab Plus Leucovorin, Fluorouracil, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) versus FOLFOX-4 in Patients with RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Cetuximab Plus Leucovorin, Fluorouracil, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) versus FOLFOX-4 in Patients with RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

机译:一线Cetuximab,氟尿嘧啶,氟尿嘧啶和Oxaliplatin(Folfox-4)对RAS野生型转移性结肠直肠癌患者的成本效果分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Compared with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) alone, cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 has shown superior performance in terms of efficacy and tolerability in patients with RAS wide-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the TAILOR trial (Trial No.: EMR62202-057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01228734). Thus, we aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of these two first-line regimens in patients with RAS wt mCRC from the Chinese societal perspective. Methods: For the sake of executing the analysis, we used a Markov model containing three health states (progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and death) to simulate the process of RAS wt mCRC. The data regarding efficacy and safety were derived from the TAILOR trial. Transition probabilities were converted from the PFS and overall survival (OS) of both groups. Utility scores of the health states were obtained from previously published studies. Costs were computed from the perspective of Chinese society. The primary health outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analysis was utilized to investigate the effect of uncertainties on the Markov model. Results: Treatment with cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 was estimated to provide an increase in quality adjusted-life years (QALYs) of 0.15 QALYs at an increased cost of $19,079 compared with FOLFOX-4 alone, resulting in an ICER of $127,193/QALY, which exceeded the threshold of willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $27,934/QALY in China. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of PFS in the cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 arm was the most influential factor in the Markov model. Conclusion: The combination of cetuximab and FOLFOX-4 is not a cost-effective strategy compared with FOLFOX-4 alone for the first-line treatment of patients with RAS wt mCRC from the perspective of Chinese society.
机译:目的:与氟尿嘧啶,白杨素和oxaliplatin(Folfox-4)相比,Cetuximab Plus folfox-4在RAS宽型(WT)转移性结肠直肠癌(MCRC)中的疗效和耐受性方面表现出优异的性能定制试验(试验编号:EMR62202-057; ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01228734)。因此,我们旨在探讨来自中国社会角度的RAS WT MCRC患者这两个一线方案的成本效益。方法:为了执行分析,我们使用含有三种健康状态的马尔可夫模型(无进展生存(PFS),渐进性疾病(PD)和死亡)来模拟RAS WT MCRC的过程。关于疗效和安全性的数据来​​自裁缝试验。从两组的PFS和总存活(OS)转换过渡概率。卫生国家的实用分数是从先前公布的研究中获得的。从中国社会的角度计算成本。初级健康结果是增量成本效益(ICER)。利用敏感性分析来研究不确定性对马尔可夫模型的影响。结果:据估计,用Cetuximab Plus Folfox-4治疗,以增加0.15 Qalys的质量调节 - 寿命(QALYS)的增加,而单独的Folfox-4相比,增加了19,079美元的成本,导致了127,193美元/ QALY的标语超过了中国27,934美元/ QALY的愿意薪酬(WTP)的门槛。敏感性分析表明,Cetuximab加folfox-4臂中PFS的成本是Markov模型中最具影响力的因素。结论:与单独的Folfox-4相比,Cetuximab和Folfox-4的组合并不是一种成本效益的策略,仅用于从中国社会的角度来看患有RAS WT MCRC患者的一线治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号