首页> 外文期刊>Burns Open >A comparison of analgesia requirements in children with burns: Do delayed referrals require higher procedural analgesia doses?
【24h】

A comparison of analgesia requirements in children with burns: Do delayed referrals require higher procedural analgesia doses?

机译:烧伤儿童镇痛要求的比较:延迟推荐需要更高的程序镇痛剂量吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Our clinical impression is that delayed referrals require more analgesia than children referred to our service acutely. Previous work demonstrated poor uptake of analgesia protocols at district hospitals with probable inadequate background and procedural analgesia, which may account for this. The purpose of this study was to compare analgesia requirements for dressing changes of paediatric patients referred to us acutely versus those children with delayed referral (i.e. more than 21?days post injury). Our hypothesis is that paediatric patients with delayed referral require higher doses of ketamine when taking length of stay and total body surface area (TBSA) of the burn into account. Methods Data for children under 12?years, admitted to the Pietermaritzburg Burn Service (PBS) from the 1 July 2017 until 30 June 2018 was reviewed. Total ketamine dose during admission, weight, days admitted and TBSA were analysed. The total ketamine use in milligram per kilogram per days admitted per TBSA (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the total ketamine dose between the acute and delayed referral groups. Results One-hundred-and-ninety-seven patients were included. Patients were divided into two groups, the acute group including those referred to the PBS early (prior to 21?days post-burn) and the delayed referral group (those referred 21?days or more post burn). The acute group consisted of 167 patients and the chronic group 30 patients. There is a statistically significant difference between the total ketamine dose (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) for the acute referral and delayed referral groups (p?=?0.01). The median total ketamine dose (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) of the acute referral group was 0.27 (Range: 0–7.05) and the median total Ketamine dose (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) for the delayed referral group was 0.41 (range: 0.1–3.89). Conclusion Patients with delayed referrals require more ketamine to achieve adequate procedural analgesia than patients referred acutely. Inadequate analgesia in the acute phase of the burn may influence this, underpinning the importance of adequate analgesia right from the time of the injury.
机译:背景技术我们的临床印象是延迟推荐需要比急剧提及我们服务的儿童更多的镇痛。以前的工作表明,区域医院的镇痛协议的吸收不足,有可能的背景和程序镇痛可能占据了这一点。本研究的目的是比较镇痛要求对儿科患者的敷料变化的要求,这些患者转诊的儿童与延迟推荐的儿童(即21多个后损伤后)。我们的假设是延迟转诊的小儿患者需要较高剂量的氯胺酮,当考虑烧伤的烧伤长度和总体表面积(TBSA)时需要更高剂量的氯胺酮。方法对12岁以下儿童的数据,审查了2017年7月1日的Pietermaritzburg Burn Service(PBS),达到2018年6月30日。分析了入院,重量,录取的天数和TBSA期间的全氯胺酮剂量。计算每次TBSA每天毫克每千克/千克/千米/ kg /天/汤匙/汤匙/汤匙/汤匙)的全氯胺酮。进行统计分析以比较急性和延迟转诊组之间的总氯胺酮剂量。结果包括一百九十七名患者。患者分为两组,急性基团包括早期(燃烧后21-天之前的PBS)和延迟转诊组(燃烧后21天或更多的那些)。急性组由167名患者和慢性组30例患者组成。急性转诊和延迟转诊组的总氯胺酮剂量(录制/ TBSA)之间存在统计学上显着的差异(P?= 0.01)。急性转诊组的中位数总氯胺酮剂量(录制/ TBSA)为0.27(范围:0-7.05)和延迟转诊组的中位数总氯胺酮剂量(录取的/ TBSA)为0.41(范围:0.1-3.89)。结论延迟推荐的患者需要更多的氯胺酮来达到足够的程序镇痛,而不是急性的患者。燃烧的急性期镇痛不足可能会影响这一点,从伤害时右翼施加足够的镇痛的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号