...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology >In response to – “Three Blocks including Pericapsular Nerve Block (PENG) for a femoral shaft fracture pain” by Onur Koyuncu et al.
【24h】

In response to – “Three Blocks including Pericapsular Nerve Block (PENG) for a femoral shaft fracture pain” by Onur Koyuncu et al.

机译:响应 - “包括股骨轴骨折疼痛的三个块(包括腓骨骨折疼痛”)。

获取原文

摘要

I read with interest a recently published article in your esteemed journal title ‘‘Three blocks including Pericapsu- lar Nerve Block (PENG) for a femoral shaft fracture pain’’ by Onur Koyuncu et al. 1 I personally congratulate the author for his innovative and intensive approach to provide analgesia in a case of fracture shaft femur extending up to head of femur. However, I have little reservation for his approach. Firstly, large volume of local anaesthetic was used to give three blocks which could lead to local anaesthetic toxicity even then, the pain control was up to 50% only. This effect could easily be attained by increasing the volume of local anaes- thetic during PENG block. Various studies have shown that large volume can block femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and obturator nerve along with assesory obturator and articular branches of femoral nerves. 2---4 Secondly, waiting for three minutes to assess clinical effect before going for second block was quite inadequate. As suggested by authors of PENG block, 5 adequate time should have been given to assess the complete clinical effect.
机译:我用兴趣阅读了最近发表的文章在尊敬的期刊标题中的三个街区,包括由onur Koyuncu等人的股骨轴骨折疼痛(彭)的植物骨折(彭)。 1我亲自祝贺作者为他的创新和密集的方法提供镇痛,以便在股骨头延伸到股骨头的骨折股骨。但是,我对他的方法几乎没有保留。首先,大量的局部麻醉剂用于给予三个嵌段,这也可以导致局部麻醉毒性,即使那么,疼痛控制才达到50%。通过增加彭块期间的局部Anaes-eta-ethic的体积,可以很容易地实现这种效果。各种研究表明,大容量可以阻断股骨,侧向股骨皮神经和闭孔神经以及股骨神经的关节分支。 2 --- 4次数,等待三分钟才能评估第二个街区前的临床效果非常不足。如彭块的作者所建议的,应该给出5个适当的时间来评估完整的临床效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号